Craig added the comment:
Surely if there is data loss this *has* to be fixed in 2.x?
I'm seeing this a *lot* using Twisted which, I believe isn't fully 3.x ported
yet, so we have to support 2.x for now.
--
nosy: +craigemery
___
Python tracker
Antoine Pitrou added the comment:
The simple fact of the matter is that socket.makefile() has never worked for
non-blocking sockets on 2.x. I doubt Twisted would be so broken as to use it in
that context, but if that's the case, you should report a bug to them. If it's
your own code, just use
Antoine Pitrou added the comment:
(closed as won't fix, sorry)
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue1038591
___
___
Python-bugs-list
Changes by Mark Lawrence breamore...@yahoo.co.uk:
--
nosy: -BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue1038591
___
___
Christian Heimes added the comment:
Shall we close this ticket then?
--
nosy: +christian.heimes
status: open - languishing
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue1038591
___
Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr added the comment:
Should work fine under 3.x.
--
nosy: +pitrou
versions: -Python 3.1, Python 3.2
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue1038591
___
Mark Lawrence breamore...@yahoo.co.uk added the comment:
Is this still valid?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: +Python 2.7, Python 3.1, Python 3.2 -Python 2.6
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue1038591
Changes by Daniel Diniz aja...@gmail.com:
--
stage: - test needed
type: - behavior
versions: +Python 2.6
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue1038591
___
