[issue10654] test_datetime sometimes fails on Python3.x windows binary

2013-08-17 Thread Terry J. Reedy
Terry J. Reedy added the comment: test_datetime passes on current 3.3 and 3.4. datetimetest.py now gives the same answer for all 4 classes unsupported operand type(s) for +: 'SubPy' and 'int' unsupported operand type(s) for +: 'int' and 'SubPy' NotImplemented NotImplemented NotImplemented NotImp

[issue10654] test_datetime sometimes fails on Python3.x windows binary

2013-08-17 Thread Ezio Melotti
Ezio Melotti added the comment: Is this still an issue? -- nosy: +ezio.melotti type: -> behavior ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bu

[issue10654] test_datetime sometimes fails on Python3.x windows binary

2012-07-25 Thread Terry J. Reedy
Terry J. Reedy added the comment: Both subclasses return NotImplemented for d+1. Otherwise, TypeError or NotImplemented as expected. See file. -- Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file26519/datetimetest.py ___ Python tracker

[issue10654] test_datetime sometimes fails on Python3.x windows binary

2012-07-25 Thread Nick Coghlan
Nick Coghlan added the comment: The precedence problems described in #11477 shouldn't factor into this case - that issue is specific to C level types that implement + and * via tp_as_sequence *without* implementing the corresponding slots in tp_as_number. That's not the case here, since datet

[issue10654] test_datetime sometimes fails on Python3.x windows binary

2012-07-25 Thread Terry J. Reedy
Terry J. Reedy added the comment: I do not see the error with installed 3.2.3. I **DO** see it consistently, when running the test with installed 3.3.0b1 on 64 bit Win 7. The only failure is == FAIL: test_computations (test.dat