[issue10867] python mmap objects issue msync() in destructor even if mapping was created with prot=mmap.PROT_READ only

2011-01-08 Thread Марк Коренберг
New submission from Марк Коренберг socketp...@gmail.com: python mmap objects issue msync() in destructor even if mapping was created with prot=mmap.PROT_READ only -- messages: 125780 nosy: mmarkk priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: python mmap objects issue msync()

[issue10867] python mmap objects issue msync() in destructor even if mapping was created with prot=mmap.PROT_READ only

2011-01-08 Thread Марк Коренберг
Марк Коренберг socketp...@gmail.com added the comment: Soory, this is dup of Issue2643 -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue10867 ___

[issue10867] python mmap objects issue msync() in destructor even if mapping was created with prot=mmap.PROT_READ only

2011-01-08 Thread Марк Коренберг
Марк Коренберг socketp...@gmail.com added the comment: i'm crazy today. sorry twice. this is not dup of 2643 :( -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue10867 ___

[issue10867] python mmap objects issue msync() in destructor even if mapping was created with prot=mmap.PROT_READ only

2011-01-08 Thread Charles-Francois Natali
Charles-Francois Natali neolo...@free.fr added the comment: python mmap objects issue msync() in destructor even if mapping was created with prot=mmap.PROT_READ only Actually, the call to msync(2) from destructor has been removed altogether in py3k. See http://bugs.python.org/issue2643.

[issue10867] python mmap objects issue msync() in destructor even if mapping was created with prot=mmap.PROT_READ only

2011-01-08 Thread R. David Murray
R. David Murray rdmur...@bitdance.com added the comment: Antoine didn't want to backport that patch. Does the fix applied in issue 678250 address this? -- nosy: +r.david.murray ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org