[issue11282] 3.3 unittest document not kept consist with code

2011-04-03 Thread Roundup Robot
Roundup Robot devnull@devnull added the comment: New changeset 1fd736395df3 by Ezio Melotti in branch '3.2': #11282: the fail* methods will stay around a few more versions. http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/1fd736395df3 New changeset 110bb604bc2f by Ezio Melotti in branch 'default': #11282:

[issue11282] 3.3 unittest document not kept consist with code

2011-04-03 Thread Ezio Melotti
Changes by Ezio Melotti ezio.melo...@gmail.com: -- resolution: - fixed stage: needs patch - committed/rejected status: open - closed ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue11282 ___

[issue11282] 3.3 unittest document not kept consist with code

2011-04-02 Thread Ezio Melotti
Ezio Melotti ezio.melo...@gmail.com added the comment: Guido decided to leave the fail* methods and assertDictContainsSubset in 3.3 (and possibly even in the following versions), so that people moving from 2.7 to 3.3 don't have to change their code because these methods are missing. Since

[issue11282] 3.3 unittest document not kept consist with code

2011-03-19 Thread Ezio Melotti
Changes by Ezio Melotti ezio.melo...@gmail.com: -- assignee: michael.foord - ezio.melotti ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue11282 ___

[issue11282] 3.3 unittest document not kept consist with code

2011-03-14 Thread Michael Foord
Michael Foord mich...@voidspace.org.uk added the comment: Those methods should *not* have been removed. I thought we had discussed this. It is my fault for allowing the error in the 3.2 docs to remain. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org

[issue11282] 3.3 unittest document not kept consist with code

2011-03-12 Thread Ezio Melotti
Ezio Melotti ezio.melo...@gmail.com added the comment: Michael, what's the status of this? Do you think some of the removed methods should be added back even if they are marked as removed in 3.3 in the 3.2 doc? -- ___ Python tracker

[issue11282] 3.3 unittest document not kept consist with code

2011-02-27 Thread Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
Changes by Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis arfrever@gmail.com: -- nosy: +Arfrever ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue11282 ___

[issue11282] 3.3 unittest document not kept consist with code

2011-02-25 Thread Terry J. Reedy
Terry J. Reedy tjre...@udel.edu added the comment: Georg, what is policy on removed features? Remove doc or leave and state removed? Deprecated in version 3.2 and removed in 3.3. or just Removed in version 3.3 (Once removed, does it really matter when deprecated?) If left, should they be

[issue11282] 3.3 unittest document not kept consist with code

2011-02-25 Thread Michael Foord
Michael Foord mich...@voidspace.org.uk added the comment: Actually I think these methods are going back in and staying deprecated, so hold off for a bit. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue11282

[issue11282] 3.3 unittest document not kept consist with code

2011-02-25 Thread Michael Foord
Changes by Michael Foord mich...@voidspace.org.uk: -- assignee: docs@python - michael.foord ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue11282 ___

[issue11282] 3.3 unittest document not kept consist with code

2011-02-25 Thread Georg Brandl
Georg Brandl ge...@python.org added the comment: Removed things are also removed from the doc. I just committed as much as was necessary to stop buildbot breakage, and notified Michael to take care of the rest (which he did, by explaining I removed the wrong thing :) --