Sandro Tosi sandro.t...@gmail.com added the comment:
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 23:56, Marc-Andre Lemburg
rep...@bugs.python.org wrote:
Marc-Andre Lemburg m...@egenix.com added the comment:
I think you misunderstood: when reorganizing the contents of
a file, it's better to apply the patch to all
Changes by Sandro Tosi sandro.t...@gmail.com:
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file21657/unicode_doc-2.7.patch
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue11840
___
Changes by Sandro Tosi sandro.t...@gmail.com:
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file21658/unicode_doc-3.1.patch
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue11840
___
Sandro Tosi sandro.t...@gmail.com added the comment:
The status of the patches is this:
unicode_doc-2.7.patch - to be applied on 2.7
unicode_doc-3.1.patch - to be applied on 3.1
unicode_doc-default.patch - to be applied on 3.2 and then merged on default
I had to prepare multiple patches since
Roundup Robot devnull@devnull added the comment:
New changeset 11c72a305eb5 by Ezio Melotti in branch '3.1':
#11840: Improve c-api/unicode documentation. Patch by Sandro Tosi.
http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/11c72a305eb5
New changeset 62679f2ca9e5 by Ezio Melotti in branch '3.2':
#11840: Merge
Roundup Robot devnull@devnull added the comment:
New changeset 7f873729484c by Ezio Melotti in branch '2.7':
#11840: Improve c-api/unicode documentation. Patch by Sandro Tosi.
http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/7f873729484c
--
___
Python tracker
Ezio Melotti ezio.melo...@gmail.com added the comment:
Fixed, thanks for the patch!
About the rewrapping:
* rewrapping what you change is OK, because I know that you changed something
and had to rewrap it;
* leaving what you changed badly-wrapped is not OK, because it makes the doc
a mess
Changes by Ezio Melotti ezio.melo...@gmail.com:
--
assignee: docs@python - ezio.melotti
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue11840
___
New submission from Sandro Tosi sandro.t...@gmail.com:
Hi,
After reading tomo cocoa mail at docs@ I gave a look at c-api/unicode file and
fixed some minor editing issues.
Regards,
Sandro
--
assignee: docs@python
components: Documentation
files: unicode_doc-default.patch
keywords:
Sandro Tosi sandro.t...@gmail.com added the comment:
In addition, is there a reason for the sorting of UTF-8 UTF-32 UTF-16 and UTF-7
sections? why not alphabetically?
Also, several parts of the doc would need paragraph re-indentation (not done in
this patch due to clarity).
--
Changes by STINNER Victor victor.stin...@haypocalc.com:
--
nosy: +haypo
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue11840
___
___
Marc-Andre Lemburg m...@egenix.com added the comment:
Sandro Tosi wrote:
Sandro Tosi sandro.t...@gmail.com added the comment:
In addition, is there a reason for the sorting of UTF-8 UTF-32 UTF-16 and
UTF-7 sections? why not alphabetically?
No particular reason. Alphabetical order would
Marc-Andre Lemburg m...@egenix.com added the comment:
Sandro Tosi wrote:
New submission from Sandro Tosi sandro.t...@gmail.com:
Hi,
After reading tomo cocoa mail at docs@ I gave a look at c-api/unicode file
and fixed some minor editing issues.
Thanks. Looks good !
--
Sandro Tosi sandro.t...@gmail.com added the comment:
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 23:34, Marc-Andre Lemburg
rep...@bugs.python.org wrote:
Sandro Tosi wrote:
Sandro Tosi sandro.t...@gmail.com added the comment:
In addition, is there a reason for the sorting of UTF-8 UTF-32 UTF-16 and
UTF-7
Marc-Andre Lemburg m...@egenix.com added the comment:
Sandro Tosi wrote:
Sandro Tosi sandro.t...@gmail.com added the comment:
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 23:34, Marc-Andre Lemburg
rep...@bugs.python.org wrote:
Sandro Tosi wrote:
Sandro Tosi sandro.t...@gmail.com added the comment:
In
Changes by Ezio Melotti ezio.melo...@gmail.com:
--
nosy: +ezio.melotti
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue11840
___
___
Ezio Melotti ezio.melo...@gmail.com added the comment:
Rewrapping the paragraphs you are changing is fine, the others can be left as
they are.
Patches should be against the oldest branch where they can be applied, and
since this is a doc patch it can go in 2.7 and 3.1 too.
Regarding the order
17 matches
Mail list logo
