Changes by Éric Araujo mer...@netwok.org:
--
nosy: +eric.araujo
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue11881
___
___
Python-bugs-list
New submission from Filip Gruszczyński grusz...@gmail.com:
I have proposed on Core Mentorship list to add get(index, default) method to
list object. I was suggested to bring it up here and also told, that improving
operator module could be a better solution. This is why I would like to ask, if
Raymond Hettinger raymond.hettin...@gmail.com added the comment:
Sorry, this has come up before and was rejected.
--
nosy: +rhettinger
resolution: - rejected
status: open - closed
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
Raymond Hettinger raymond.hettin...@gmail.com added the comment:
What did you have in mind for the operator module?
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue11881
___
Filip Gruszczyński grusz...@gmail.com added the comment:
Nick Coghlan suggested, that operator.getitem could be extended to accept
default value. How does it sound to you?
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
Raymond Hettinger raymond.hettin...@gmail.com added the comment:
operator.getitem could be extended to accept default value
That would be relatively harmless. And because it isn't type specific to
lists, it would be applicable to other types that might better use cases than
lists do.
If
