[issue1265] pdb bug with with statement

2007-11-13 Thread Amaury Forgeot d'Arc
Amaury Forgeot d'Arc added the comment: BTW**2: I've noticed that abc.py's __instancecheck__ gets called a lot at times when I don't expect it. Can you research this a bit? In classobject.c, method_call() calls PyObject_IsInstance() on the first arg when the method is unbound. This happens a

[issue1265] pdb bug with with statement

2007-11-12 Thread Amaury Forgeot d'Arc
Amaury Forgeot d'Arc added the comment: Corrected by revision 58958. with is innocent. The problem is this function in abc.py which uses a generator expression: def __instancecheck__(cls, instance): Override for isinstance(instance, cls). return any(cls.__subclasscheck__(c)

[issue1265] pdb bug with with statement

2007-11-12 Thread Amaury Forgeot d'Arc
Amaury Forgeot d'Arc added the comment: __instancecheck__ should be simpler: all classes are new-style, how is it possible to have different results for instance.__class__ and type(instance) ? __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue1265

[issue1265] pdb bug with with statement

2007-11-12 Thread Christian Heimes
Christian Heimes added the comment: Good work Amaury! :) I also wonder how type(cls) != cls.__class__ is possible with new style classes. So far I found only one way and it ain't beautiful: class Meta(type): ... def __getattribute__(self, key): ... if key == __class__: return

[issue1265] pdb bug with with statement

2007-11-12 Thread Guido van Rossum
Guido van Rossum added the comment: Good work indeed! Here's another way: class C: ... @property ... def __class__(self): return D ... class D: pass ... C().__class__ class '__main__.D' __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue1265

[issue1265] pdb bug with with statement

2007-11-12 Thread Guido van Rossum
Guido van Rossum added the comment: BTW: if you can show (e.g. with your unittest) that this indeed breaks in 2.6 and 2.5, please do backport it. BTW**2: I've noticed that abc.py's __instancecheck__ gets called a lot at times when I don't expect it. Can you research this a bit?

[issue1265] pdb bug with with statement

2007-11-12 Thread Guido van Rossum
Guido van Rossum added the comment: PPSS. When backporting, a note in Misc/NEWS is appreciated. __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue1265 __ ___ Python-bugs-list

[issue1265] pdb bug with with statement

2007-11-02 Thread Christian Heimes
Christian Heimes added the comment: The bug makes debugging a crux :( -- priority: - high resolution: - accepted type: - behavior __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue1265 __

[issue1265] pdb bug with with statement

2007-10-11 Thread Guido van Rossum
Changes by Guido van Rossum: -- nosy: +gvanrossum __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue1265 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: