[issue13297] xmlrpc.client could accept bytes for input and output

2011-11-15 Thread Roundup Robot
Roundup Robot devn...@psf.upfronthosting.co.za added the comment: New changeset 0175883d9513 by Florent Xicluna in branch 'default': Closes #13297: use bytes type to send and receive binary data through XMLRPC. http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/0175883d9513 -- nosy: +python-dev

[issue13297] xmlrpc.client could accept bytes for input and output

2011-11-12 Thread Éric Araujo
Éric Araujo mer...@netwok.org added the comment: I made comments on Rietveld but there was a glitch, I’m not sure the email was sent. -- nosy: +eric.araujo ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue13297

[issue13297] xmlrpc.client could accept bytes for input and output

2011-11-12 Thread Florent Xicluna
Florent Xicluna florent.xicl...@gmail.com added the comment: Thank you for your comments. Uploaded a new version. -- Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file23665/issue13297_xmlrpc_bytes_v4.diff ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org

[issue13297] xmlrpc.client could accept bytes for input and output

2011-11-10 Thread Florent Xicluna
Florent Xicluna florent.xicl...@gmail.com added the comment: Maybe a flag use_builtin_types is preferred? It should implies both `bytes` and `datetime.datetime` are used for presenting data received. I don't see a use case where we would like to have `bytes` for binary data but keep

[issue13297] xmlrpc.client could accept bytes for input and output

2011-11-10 Thread Florent Xicluna
Florent Xicluna florent.xicl...@gmail.com added the comment: This patch v3 implements the proposal of use_builtin_types flag. In this case the use_datetime flag becomes obsolete. Please comment. -- Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file23653/issue13297_xmlrpc_bytes_v3.diff

[issue13297] xmlrpc.client could accept bytes for input and output

2011-11-09 Thread Florent Xicluna
Florent Xicluna florent.xicl...@gmail.com added the comment: Updated with documentation. -- nosy: +effbot, fdrake, skip.montanaro Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file23648/issue13291_xmlrpc_v2.diff ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org

[issue13297] xmlrpc.client could accept bytes for input and output

2011-11-09 Thread Florent Xicluna
Changes by Florent Xicluna florent.xicl...@gmail.com: Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file23648/issue13291_xmlrpc_v2.diff ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue13297 ___

[issue13297] xmlrpc.client could accept bytes for input and output

2011-11-09 Thread Florent Xicluna
Florent Xicluna florent.xicl...@gmail.com added the comment: Ooops wrong patch. -- Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file23649/issue13297_xmlrpc_bytes_v2.diff ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue13297

[issue13297] xmlrpc.client could accept bytes for input and output

2011-10-30 Thread Florent Xicluna
New submission from Florent Xicluna florent.xicl...@gmail.com: Since Python 3 makes clear the distinction between bytes and string, there is no more reason to use the xmlrpc.client.Binary wrapper for binary objects. The xmlrpc library may deal with bytes and bytearray normally. To support

[issue13297] xmlrpc.client could accept bytes for input and output

2011-10-30 Thread Florent Xicluna
Changes by Florent Xicluna florent.xicl...@gmail.com: -- keywords: +patch stage: - patch review Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file23564/issue13297_xmlrpc_bytes.diff ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue13297