[issue1371826] distutils is silent about multiple -I/-L/-R

Steve Dower added the comment: Distutils is now deprecated (see PEP 632) and all tagged issues are being closed. From now until removal, only release blocking issues will be considered for distutils. If this issue does not relate to distutils, please remove the component and reopen it. If y

[issue1371826] distutils is silent about multiple -I/-L/-R

STINNER Victor added the comment: This issue is 14 years old: it's far from being "newcomer friendly", I remove the "Easy" label. -- nosy: +vstinner ___ Python tracker ___

[issue1371826] distutils is silent about multiple -I/-L/-R

Changes by Ezio Melotti : -- versions: -Python 2.7, Python 3.4 ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe

[issue1371826] distutils is silent about multiple -I/-L/-R

Changes by Mark Lawrence : -- components: -Distutils2 nosy: +dstufft versions: +Python 3.4, Python 3.5 -3rd party, Python 3.1, Python 3.2 ___ Python tracker ___ __

[issue1371826] distutils is silent about multiple -I/-L/-R

Changes by Éric Araujo : -- assignee: tarek -> eric.araujo keywords: +easy ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list

[issue1371826] distutils is silent about multiple -I/-L/-R

Changes by Skip Montanaro : -- nosy: -skip.montanaro ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://

[issue1371826] distutils is silent about multiple -I/-L/-R

Skip Montanaro added the comment: I would prefer the gcc-like behavior. I realize there are constraints on making changes in distutils1, so what you propose sounds fine to me. -- nosy: +skip.montanaro ___ Python tracker

[issue1371826] distutils is silent about multiple -I/-L/-R

Éric Araujo added the comment: Skip, do you agree with my proposal (no behavior change in d1, better behavior in d2) or do you think it could be confusing? -- ___ Python tracker

[issue1371826] distutils is silent about multiple -I/-L/-R

Éric Araujo added the comment: +1 on handling those options like gcc in distutils2. +1 on printing warnings in distutils1, but I don’t know if it could break third-party code, so Tarek will accept or reject. -- components: +Distutils versions: +Python 2.7, Python 3.1, Python 3.2

[issue1371826] distutils is silent about multiple -I/-L/-R

Changes by Éric Araujo : -- Removed message: http://bugs.python.org/msg107248 ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing li

[issue1371826] distutils is silent about multiple -I/-L/-R

Changes by Éric Araujo : -- versions: +3rd party -Python 2.5, Python 2.6, Python 2.7, Python 3.1, Python 3.2 ___ Python tracker ___

[issue1371826] distutils is silent about multiple -I/-L/-R

Changes by Éric Araujo : -- assignee: -> tarek components: +Distutils2 -Distutils stage: -> needs patch versions: +Python 2.5, Python 2.6, Python 2.7, Python 3.1 ___ Python tracker _

[issue1371826] distutils is silent about multiple -I/-L/-R

Changes by Terry J. Reedy : -- versions: +Python 3.2 -Python 2.6, Python 2.7, Python 3.0, Python 3.1 ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Pyth

[issue1371826] distutils is silent about multiple -I/-L/-R

Éric Araujo added the comment: I suggest changing component to Distutils2. -- nosy: +merwok ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-

[issue1371826] distutils is silent about multiple -I/-L/-R

Changes by Skip Montanaro : -- nosy: -skip.montanaro ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://

[issue1371826] distutils is silent about multiple -I/-L/-R

Changes by Akira Kitada : -- nosy: +tarek type: -> feature request versions: +Python 2.6, Python 2.7, Python 3.0, Python 3.1 -Python 2.5 ___ Python tracker ___ ___