[issue13851] Packaging distutils2 for Fedora

2012-02-03 Thread Éric Araujo
Changes by Éric Araujo mer...@netwok.org: -- resolution: - invalid stage: - committed/rejected ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue13851 ___

[issue13851] Packaging distutils2 for Fedora

2012-01-30 Thread Éric Araujo
Éric Araujo mer...@netwok.org added the comment: Thanks for your support of distutils2, but this tracker is the wrong place for this bug tracker, as no RPM spec file will be added to the distutils2 repo. If there are bugs in distutils2 that prevent you from making a RPM, please say so,

[issue13851] Packaging distutils2 for Fedora

2012-01-30 Thread Vikash Agrawal
Vikash Agrawal vikashagrawal1...@gmail.com added the comment: hi merwok, I didn't know this is the right place for that bug/query. I am still in the process of learning packaging, and at this moment I wont be able to tell that if its a problem of distutils2 or not, though I do feel that

[issue13851] Packaging distutils2 for Fedora

2012-01-24 Thread Vikash Agrawal
New submission from Vikash Agrawal vikashagrawal1...@gmail.com: Packaging distutils2 for Fedora The spec file, is attached and lack many things. I also need to add files like README, COPYING etc. The problem is, after installtion of the generated rpm, python

[issue13851] Packaging distutils2 for Fedora

2012-01-24 Thread Dave Malcolm
Dave Malcolm dmalc...@redhat.com added the comment: Hi Vikash - thanks for working on this. It's normal when packaging code downstream for Fedora to file a package review request at bugzilla.redhat.com, following the process here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process (sorry