Éric Araujo mer...@netwok.org added the comment:
I have the same one on Debian testing:
==
FAIL: test_apropos_with_bad_package (test.test_pydoc.PydocImportTest)
Stefan Krah stefan-use...@bytereef.org added the comment:
Eric Araujo rep...@bugs.python.org wrote:
docutils is the first package that???s found in my user site-packages;
can you tell if your Crypto package is in that same location?
The package is here:
Éric Araujo mer...@netwok.org added the comment:
Adding Ned, who refactored these tests, to nosy.
--
nosy: +ned.deily
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue13861
___
Roundup Robot devn...@psf.upfronthosting.co.za added the comment:
New changeset e5f2c04055a2 by Ned Deily in branch '2.7':
Issue #13861: Prevent test_apropos* test case failures in test_pydoc.
http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/e5f2c04055a2
New changeset 5eb47e1732a0 by Ned Deily in branch '3.2':
Ned Deily n...@acm.org added the comment:
For the as-yet unreleased changes for Issue7425, I added some test cases for
pydoc -k (apropos) and chose a keyword of nothing, a keyword which has no
hits in the standard library. Unfortunately, you both installed third-party
packages that *do* have
New submission from Stefan Krah stefan-use...@bytereef.org:
test_pydoc fails on Ubuntu Lucid:
==
FAIL: test_apropos_with_bad_package (test.test_pydoc.PydocImportTest)
