[issue1439312] Patch for bug 1438185: os.renames deletes junction points

Changes by Mark Lawrence : -- nosy: -BreamoreBoy ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mai

[issue1439312] Patch for bug 1438185: os.renames deletes junction points

Changes by Ezio Melotti : -- versions: +Python 3.3 -Python 3.1 ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe:

[issue1439312] Patch for bug 1438185: os.renames deletes junction points

Mark Lawrence added the comment: @Brian, Tim, any views on this? -- components: +Library (Lib) -None nosy: +BreamoreBoy, brian.curtin, tim.golden versions: +Python 2.7, Python 3.1, Python 3.2 -Python 2.6, Python 3.0 ___ Python tracker

[issue1439312] Patch for bug 1438185: os.renames deletes junction points

Changes by Daniel Diniz : -- stage: -> test needed type: -> behavior versions: +Python 3.0 -Python 2.5 ___ Python tracker ___ ___

[issue1439312] Patch for bug 1438185: os.renames deletes junction points

Martin v. Löwis added the comment: I'm skeptical. If you consider junction points similar to symlinks on POSIX, then it would be semantically correct to leave the junction point in place, independent of whether their target directory is empty or not - on Unix, rmdir fails if the target is a symli

[issue1439312] Patch for bug 1438185: os.renames deletes junction points

Christian Heimes added the comment: Martin, you are the Windows expert. Does it sound right to you? -- assignee: -> loewis nosy: +loewis, tiran versions: +Python 2.5, Python 2.6 _ Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>