[issue14674] Link to & explain deviations from RFC 4627 in json module docs

Chris Rebert added the comment: Reflect broader scope -- title: Add link to RFC 4627 from json documentation -> Link to & explain deviations from RFC 4627 in json module docs ___ Python tracker __

[issue14674] Link to & explain deviations from RFC 4627 in json module docs

Changes by Éric Araujo : -- stage: needs patch -> commit review title: Add link to RFC 4627 from json documentation -> Link to & explain deviations from RFC 4627 in json module docs ___ Python tracker

[issue14674] Link to & explain deviations from RFC 4627 in json module docs

Chris Rebert added the comment: Hopefully final revision. Thanks for the quick response Éric! Changes: - Cover `ensure_ascii` parameter per latest review comment - Add enhanced "Character Encodings" section for 2.x backport -- Cover `encoding` parameter & restrictions -- Cover non-implementatio

[issue14674] Link to & explain deviations from RFC 4627 in json module docs

Changes by Chris Rebert : Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file25594/json.rst.patch ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing li

[issue14674] Link to & explain deviations from RFC 4627 in json module docs

Chris Rebert added the comment: Any further comments now that the matter of encodings is covered more thoroughly? -- Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file25999/json.rst.patch ___ Python tracker

[issue14674] Link to & explain deviations from RFC 4627 in json module docs

Changes by Chris Rebert : Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file25606/json.rst.patch ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing li

[issue14674] Link to & explain deviations from RFC 4627 in json module docs

Éric Araujo added the comment: This looks good to me, apart from very minor style things that I can change before committing. Ezio, any last comments? One thing I haven’t done is comparing the length of the new section to the rest of the file to see if it’s a small or big addition; if it’s t

[issue14674] Link to & explain deviations from RFC 4627 in json module docs

Chris Rebert added the comment: Pinging on this, since it's been just short of a month since Éric's "last call" comment. -- ___ Python tracker ___ _

[issue14674] Link to & explain deviations from RFC 4627 in json module docs

Petri Lehtinen added the comment: Using the word "scalar" sounds wrong to me. Are strings really considered scalars in Python? At least RFC 4627 doesn't talk about scalars. +Since the RFC permits RFC-compliant parsers to accept input texts that are not +RFC-compliant, this module's deserialize

[issue14674] Link to & explain deviations from RFC 4627 in json module docs

Éric Araujo added the comment: See also #13212. -- ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.

[issue14674] Link to & explain deviations from RFC 4627 in json module docs

Georg Brandl added the comment: Neither json.org nor RFC 4627 mention "scalar". I don't think we should introduce that term, with the necessary ambiguity given the context, needlessly. -- nosy: +georg.brandl ___ Python tracker

[issue14674] Link to & explain deviations from RFC 4627 in json module docs

Chris Rebert added the comment: Revised patch yet again to instead speak of "non-object, non-array" values and "JSON null, boolean, number, or string" values. Re: Petri, the patch already mentions the specific parameters one can use to get stricter behavior, albeit not in that particular short

[issue14674] Link to & explain deviations from RFC 4627 in json module docs

Antoine Pitrou added the comment: Chris, I'm gonna take a look if nobody beats me to it. -- nosy: +pitrou ___ Python tracker ___ ___ P

[issue14674] Link to & explain deviations from RFC 4627 in json module docs

Roundup Robot added the comment: New changeset 132886ef135d by Antoine Pitrou in branch '3.2': Issue #14674: Add a discussion of the json module's standard compliance. http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/132886ef135d New changeset 16c0e26fc9cd by Antoine Pitrou in branch 'default': Issue #14674: Ad

[issue14674] Link to & explain deviations from RFC 4627 in json module docs

Antoine Pitrou added the comment: Ok, thank you Chris! -- resolution: -> fixed stage: commit review -> committed/rejected status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker ___ _