[issue1498363] Improve super() objects support for implicit method calls

Changes by Senthil Kumaran : -- keywords: -after moratorium ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe:

[issue1498363] Improve super() objects support for implicit method calls

Raymond Hettinger added the comment: Am rejecting this feature request because of the concerns mentioned in the post on 4/3. The current requirement for explicit forwarding may be slightly inconvenient to type but it does add provide clarity that the method should be applied to the next-in-m

[issue1498363] Improve super() objects support for implicit method calls

Terry J. Reedy added the comment: I believe this is covered by the PEP3003 3.2 change moratorium. -- keywords: +after moratorium -patch nosy: +terry.reedy versions: +Python 3.3 -Python 3.2 ___ Python tracker ___

[issue1498363] Improve super() objects support for implicit method calls

Mark Lawrence added the comment: msg50389 asked for this to be discussed on python-dev. I've searched the archives but didn't find anything obvious. Did I simply miss it or was it never discussed? -- nosy: +BreamoreBoy versions: +Python 3.2 -Python 2.7, Python 3.1 _

[issue1498363] Improve super() objects support for implicit method calls

Changes by Daniel Diniz : -- stage: -> patch review type: -> feature request versions: +Python 2.7, Python 3.1 -Python 2.6 ___ Python tracker ___