Changes by Éric Araujo mer...@netwok.org:
--
nosy: +eric.araujo
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue15048
___
___
Python-bugs-list
James Kyle b...@jameskyle.org added the comment:
I think Ned does have some good points regarding the minimal impact a reversion
would have.
The most poignant point is that /Library/ on OS X is not a user controlled
directory whereas ~/.local is. If ~/.local exists and has packages installed,
New submission from James Kyle b...@jameskyle.org:
This behavior is present on OS X 10.7 and framework builds.
In this case, the /Library/Python/version paths are included in every
install.
I would consider this behavior non-standard as in most manual python installs
only that installations
Ronald Oussoren ronaldousso...@mac.com added the comment:
This is intentional behavior, you can install packages you want to share
between python installations in /Library/Python instead of the regular
site-packages directory.
Macports could always patch their site.py file to avoid this.
Ronald Oussoren ronaldousso...@mac.com added the comment:
This was added in issue4865.
(The same behavior is present in 3.2 and 3.3)
--
resolution: - rejected
versions: +Python 3.2, Python 3.3
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
Changes by Ronald Oussoren ronaldousso...@mac.com:
--
status: open - closed
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue15048
___
___
James Kyle b...@jameskyle.org added the comment:
Am I missing something or were the problems delineated in issue #4865 solvable
by simply sys.path.append(/Library/Python/2.7/site-packages)?
What would the process be for reopening this issue for discussion?
I'm not sure this is the right way
Ronald Oussoren ronaldousso...@mac.com added the comment:
Python installation are already not isolated: there is a per-user site-packages
directory on all platforms that is shared between all installations of a
particular python release. This directory is located in a subdirectory of
~/.local
James Kyle b...@jameskyle.org added the comment:
Fair enough. Thanks!
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue15048
___
___
Ned Deily n...@acm.org added the comment:
I have to admit that I'm not keen on this feature for the reasons James cited.
And I think the example of the shared user site directory is not a good
analogy. In that case, you, as a user, have more control over the presence and
contents of the
Ned Deily n...@acm.org added the comment:
A few more thoughts. The original impetus for this feature was Issue4865. The
use case there seem to be from users of Google App Engine back when it was
released using Python 2.5. It seems to me that the use of dmg installers for
Python packages has
11 matches
Mail list logo
