[issue1513299] Clean up usage of map() in the stdlib

Georg Brandl added the comment: Committed what was left applicable of the patch in r87020. -- resolution: -> fixed status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker ___ _

[issue1513299] Clean up usage of map() in the stdlib

Changes by Éric Araujo : -- nosy: +eric.araujo -BreamoreBoy ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: h

[issue1513299] Clean up usage of map() in the stdlib

Georg Brandl added the comment: I'll have a look. -- assignee: anthonybaxter -> georg.brandl ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs

[issue1513299] Clean up usage of map() in the stdlib

Mark Lawrence added the comment: msg69981 refers to #3390 which was closed fixed for has_key. As this is similar could this go into 3.2 subject to acceptance? The patch file is really a list of one line changes to get rid of map. -- nosy: +BreamoreBoy versions: +Python 3.2 -Python 2

[issue1513299] Clean up usage of map() in the stdlib

Changes by Daniel Diniz : -- stage: -> patch review type: -> feature request versions: +Python 2.7, Python 3.1 -Python 2.6 ___ Python tracker ___

[issue1513299] Clean up usage of map() in the stdlib

engelbert gruber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: http://bugs.python.org/issue3390 is similar trivial , replacing has_key by in (this small patches might be considered tweaking the bugfix statistic) i am off now (tell me if you think i should stay there) On 7/18/08, Georg Brandl <[EMAIL P

[issue1513299] Clean up usage of map() in the stdlib

Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: OK, I nixed the "simple" uses of map(None, a). ___ Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ___

[issue1513299] Clean up usage of map() in the stdlib

engelbert gruber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: it is only one in string.py, but then again it is save to do. thanks On 7/18/08, Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: > > > I can replace those too. > > > ___

[issue1513299] Clean up usage of map() in the stdlib

Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: I can replace those too. ___ Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list m

[issue1513299] Clean up usage of map() in the stdlib

engelbert gruber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: so i add a one liner replacing map(None with list ? On 7/18/08, Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: > > > That is true. Barry might not want to allow a large catch-all patch; but

[issue1513299] Clean up usage of map() in the stdlib

Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: That is true. Barry might not want to allow a large catch-all patch; but since those changes are not adding new features, simple small ones can certainly get in before beta3. ___ Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTEC

[issue1513299] Clean up usage of map() in the stdlib

engelbert gruber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: i just wanted to get rid of one "python2.6 -3" warning in string and found that a patch was already waiting. from this thing i conclude smaller patches might get committed earlier , do they ? On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 8:42 PM, Georg Brandl <[

[issue1513299] Clean up usage of map() in the stdlib

Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: May even be too late for 2.6. :) ___ Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ___ ___ Python-bug

[issue1513299] Clean up usage of map() in the stdlib

engelbert gruber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: and now it is 2.6 ? -- nosy: +grubert ___ Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ___