[issue1521051] Allow passing DocTestRunner and DocTestCase in doctest

mike mcleod added the comment: I would like to help on this issue. -- nosy: +mikecmcleod ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-l

[issue1521051] Allow passing DocTestRunner and DocTestCase in doctest

Changes by Mark Lawrence : -- nosy: -BreamoreBoy ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mai

[issue1521051] Allow passing DocTestRunner and DocTestCase in doctest

Jason Myers added the comment: The attached file contains a simple test for this code to make sure the test runner is being applied. I've never submitted anything before, so it might be totally naive. -- nosy: +jasonamyers Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file31059/test.patch _

[issue1521051] Allow passing DocTestRunner and DocTestCase in doctest

Andrew Svetlov added the comment: I like the patch but please add tests also. We need to put new behavior in stone :) Take a look on comments to the patch also. -- ___ Python tracker _

[issue1521051] Allow passing DocTestRunner and DocTestCase in doctest

Kostyantyn Leschenko added the comment: I've updated patch to work with current trunk and added new params to doctest documentation. -- nosy: +Kostyantyn.Leschenko Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file29714/doctest-configuration-1.diff ___ Python t

[issue1521051] Allow passing DocTestRunner and DocTestCase in doctest

Changes by Andrew Svetlov : -- nosy: +asvetlov ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.py

[issue1521051] Allow passing DocTestRunner and DocTestCase in doctest

Chris Jerdonek added the comment: I think this would be useful as well. For example, it would let one more easily get finer-grained test result data (e.g. to the level of doctest examples rather than just the TestCase level). Without this, I needed to monkey patch. The previously attached p