[issue15228] os.utime() docs not clear on behavior on nonexistant files

2013-10-06 Thread Roundup Robot
Roundup Robot added the comment: New changeset 62321359c35b by Georg Brandl in branch '3.3': Closes #15228: remove reference to Unix touch; it is confusing since the path needs to exist for os.utime() to succeed http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/62321359c35b -- nosy: +python-dev

[issue15228] os.utime() docs not clear on behavior on nonexistant files

2012-07-14 Thread Larry Hastings
Larry Hastings la...@hastings.org added the comment: I don't think this needs clarifying. If you think the reference to touch currently only muddles the issue, let's remove it entirely. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org

[issue15228] os.utime() docs not clear on behavior on nonexistant files

2012-07-07 Thread Brian Brazil
Brian Brazil brian.bra...@gmail.com added the comment: Here's a patch that should clarify this. -- keywords: +patch nosy: +bbrazil Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file26306/issue15228-utime-touch-doc.patch ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org

[issue15228] os.utime() docs not clear on behavior on nonexistant files

2012-07-07 Thread Larry Hastings
Changes by Larry Hastings la...@hastings.org: -- nosy: +larry ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue15228 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing

[issue15228] os.utime() docs not clear on behavior on nonexistant files

2012-06-30 Thread Daniel Grace
New submission from Daniel Grace thisgenericn...@gmail.com: The documentation for os.utime() at http://docs.python.org/py3k/library/os.html#os.utime states: Set the access and modified times of the file specified by path. [...] The effect is similar to running the Unix program touch on the