[issue1529142] Allowing multiple instances of IDLE with sub-processes

2009-04-25 Thread Kurt B. Kaiser
Kurt B. Kaiser k...@shore.net added the comment: Opened a bug to get the -n switch removed from the Windows Installer Edit with IDLE function. -- superseder: - Parts of Tkinter missing (but not when running from IDLE) ___ Python tracker

[issue1529142] Allowing multiple instances of IDLE with sub-processes

2009-04-04 Thread Kurt B. Kaiser
Kurt B. Kaiser k...@shore.net added the comment: r71126. Thanks to everyone for all the work on this! Note: I still need to patch the Windows install to bind .py files to a different command string. The -e option now only opens an editor window, but I need to remove the -n option. --

[issue1529142] Allowing multiple instances of IDLE with sub-processes

2009-04-01 Thread Kurt B. Kaiser
Kurt B. Kaiser k...@shore.net added the comment: The hooks for the IP address will be needed if we add remote debugging to IDLE, so I'd like to keep them. Otherwise, David Scherer's idea re using an ephemeral port assignment looks very promising. I'll check something in. --

[issue1529142] Allowing multiple instances of IDLE with sub-processes

2009-03-18 Thread Raymond Hettinger
Raymond Hettinger rhettin...@users.sourceforge.net added the comment: Is there anyone following this thread that thinks the weeble's patch is not ready to commit? -- assignee: kbk - rhettinger nosy: +rhettinger ___ Python tracker

[issue1529142] Allowing multiple instances of IDLE with sub-processes

2009-01-26 Thread Weeble
Weeble clockworksa...@gmail.com added the comment: A thought occurs to me: would this patch make it harder to cope with awkward firewalls that block the connection? Are they more or less likely to intervene when passing a port of 0 and letting it pick a port automatically? And if they do

[issue1529142] Allowing multiple instances of IDLE with sub-processes

2009-01-26 Thread Gabriel Genellina
Gabriel Genellina gagsl-...@yahoo.com.ar added the comment: If this patch were accepted, #5065 would be a non-issue then. -- nosy: +gagenellina ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue1529142

[issue1529142] Allowing multiple instances of IDLE with sub-processes

2009-01-24 Thread Weeble
Weeble clockworksa...@gmail.com added the comment: I installed Ubuntu on a laptop at the beginning of January and have applied the patch I submitted above to IDLE. I've been using it regularly for the last few weeks and have had no problems with it. ___

[issue1529142] Allowing multiple instances of IDLE with sub-processes

2008-12-01 Thread Weeble
Changes by Weeble [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file12180/IDLE_automatic_ports.diff ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue1529142 ___

[issue1529142] Allowing multiple instances of IDLE with sub-processes

2008-12-01 Thread Weeble
Weeble [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: Okay, I've uploaded a patch. As suggested, it passes 0 for the port number and the port is automatically assigned. It then extracts the port from the socket and passes it to the subprocess. Note that this means the subprocess inherits the listening

[issue1529142] Allowing multiple instances of IDLE with sub-processes

2008-11-29 Thread Tal Einat
Tal Einat [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: First of all, the multiprocessing module doesn't work fully in an interactive shell. From the Python2.6 docs: Note Functionality within this package requires that the __main__ method be importable by the children. This is covered in Programming

[issue1529142] Allowing multiple instances of IDLE with sub-processes

2008-11-27 Thread Weeble
Weeble [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: Is this ever likely to make it into IDLE? Running without a subprocess in Windows appears to interact badly with the multiprocessing library (attempting to spawn a process just creates a new IDLE window). I couldn't figure out how to apply the patch

[issue1529142] Allowing multiple instances of IDLE with sub-processes

2008-11-20 Thread Weeble
Changes by Weeble [EMAIL PROTECTED]: -- nosy: +weeble ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue1529142 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list

[issue1529142] Allowing multiple instances of IDLE with sub-processes

2008-04-16 Thread Guilherme Polo
Guilherme Polo [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: Works fine for me, I just dislike that Port binding error message because it is a bit misleading. It says IDLE can't bind any TCP/IP port, ... which is not entirely true. -- nosy: +gpolo _ Tracker

[issue1529142] Allowing multiple instances of IDLE with sub-processes

2008-04-16 Thread Tal Einat
Tal Einat [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: Thanks for taking the time to review this patch, Guilherme. For the record, on which OS+Python have you tested this? _ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue1529142

[issue1529142] Allowing multiple instances of IDLE with sub-processes

2008-04-16 Thread Guilherme Polo
Guilherme Polo [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: I tested under Linux (Ubuntu distro), Python trunk _ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue1529142 _ ___

[issue1529142] Allowing multiple instances of IDLE with sub-processes

2008-04-14 Thread Tal Einat
Tal Einat [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: I really, really wish we could get this in for Python2.6 - this issue is a major drawback for beginners, for whom IDLE is mostly intended. Perhaps not this specific patch; I am willing to work on cleaning up the code and getting it tested by users