[issue15331] Codecs docs should explain that the bytes-bytes shorthand aliases are missing

Nick Coghlan added the comment: The aliases are back in 3.4+ -- resolution: -> out of date stage: needs patch -> committed/rejected status: open -> closed type: behavior -> ___ Python tracker

[issue15331] Codecs docs should explain that the bytes-bytes shorthand aliases are missing

Ezio Melotti added the comment: Should they just be removed from the table then? -- versions: +Python 3.4 -Python 3.2 ___ Python tracker ___ _

[issue15331] Codecs docs should explain that the bytes-bytes shorthand aliases are missing

Changes by Éric Araujo : -- keywords: +easy ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.

[issue15331] Codecs docs should explain that the bytes-bytes shorthand aliases are missing

Nick Coghlan added the comment: While you're right about that, the docs shouldn't be claiming they're available as long as that is the case. Updated the issue to make it clear this is a problem with the current docs and the change in the nature of the encode() and decode() methods for Python