[issue15376] Refactor the test_runpy walk_package support code into a common location

Change by Mark Lawrence : -- nosy: -BreamoreBoy ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail

[issue15376] Refactor the test_runpy walk_package support code into a common location

Changes by Nick Coghlan : -- assignee: ncoghlan -> ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mai

[issue15376] Refactor the test_runpy walk_package support code into a common location

Christie added the comment: @BreamoreBoy, it looks like the next step would be to revisit issue15403 and go through the steps outlined by @ncoghlan. -- nosy: +bobcatfish ___ Python tracker

[issue15376] Refactor the test_runpy walk_package support code into a common location

Mark Lawrence added the comment: The chain of dependencies goes from here to #15403, #18576 and back here. How do we break this loop? -- nosy: +BreamoreBoy type: -> enhancement versions: +Python 3.5 -Python 3.3, Python 3.4 ___ Python tracker

[issue15376] Refactor the test_runpy walk_package support code into a common location

Nick Coghlan added the comment: test.support is now a subpackage in both 3.3 and default, but test.support.package_helper still needs to be created (see comments on #15403) -- versions: +Python 3.4 ___ Python tracker

[issue15376] Refactor the test_runpy walk_package support code into a common location

Changes by Eric Snow : -- nosy: +eric.snow ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.o

[issue15376] Refactor the test_runpy walk_package support code into a common location

Changes by Nick Coghlan : -- dependencies: +Add temp_dir() and change_cwd() to test.support ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-lis

[issue15376] Refactor the test_runpy walk_package support code into a common location

Changes by Nick Coghlan : -- assignee: -> ncoghlan ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail

[issue15376] Refactor the test_runpy walk_package support code into a common location

Chris Jerdonek added the comment: Hi Nick, I was wondering if you'd have time to take a look at the patches I've uploaded to issue 15403 and issue 15415 at some point. Once those are addressed, I think we will be in a much better position to address most of this issue. -- __

[issue15376] Refactor the test_runpy walk_package support code into a common location

Chris Jerdonek added the comment: I created issue 15415 and uploaded a patch there with this issue in mind. test_runpy contains supporting _make_pkg() and _del_pkg() methods that, among other things, create and delete a temp directory. That logic would be better handled by a temp directory con

[issue15376] Refactor the test_runpy walk_package support code into a common location

Chris Jerdonek added the comment: I'm going to address this issue in parts to make it easier to review and see what is going on. The first patch I'm uploading shortly here: issue 15403. That issue I created to address just the "file creation" part of the code. The approach I'm taking is to