[issue1581] xmlrpclib.ServerProxy() doesn't use x509 data

Benjamin Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: I assume you wanted to close this too. -- nosy: +benjamin.peterson status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> __

[issue1581] xmlrpclib.ServerProxy() doesn't use x509 data

Bill Janssen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: No test case. No provision for client validation of server certificate. -- resolution: -> rejected __ Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> __ _

[issue1581] xmlrpclib.ServerProxy() doesn't use x509 data

Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: Let's tentatively say this needs to go into 2.6. Bill, if in the end you decide against it, just reject the patch. -- priority: -> critical versions: +Python 2.6 -Python 2.5 __ Tracker <[EMAIL PROT

[issue1581] xmlrpclib.ServerProxy() doesn't use x509 data

Bill Janssen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: Looking at this patch, I definitely agree with the need for documentation.And a test case which uses the SafeTransport class. But the patch itself also needs a bit more work. (It uses httplib.HTTPS underneath, and that needs more work, too

[issue1581] xmlrpclib.ServerProxy() doesn't use x509 data

Sean Reifschneider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: This patch also needs to include a patch to the documentation. Martin: Do you agree with the discussion on the changes for 2.6? -- nosy: +jafo __ Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

[issue1581] xmlrpclib.ServerProxy() doesn't use x509 data

Andreas Hasenack added the comment: The only difference between xmlrpclib.py from trunk and 2.5.1 is in the Marshaller class. Unrelated, as far as I can see. Note that it seems that the intent of the original code was to support this x509-dict all along: $ grep -n x509 xmlrpclib.py.trunk 1224:

[issue1581] xmlrpclib.ServerProxy() doesn't use x509 data

Martin v. Löwis added the comment: I would like to ask the submitter to review the code himself for suitability in 2.6. The underlying API has been extended a lot, so it's unlikely that this patch is still the best choice. -- nosy: +loewis __ Tracker <[EM

[issue1581] xmlrpclib.ServerProxy() doesn't use x509 data

Guido van Rossum added the comment: This should be considered for 2.6, not 2.5 (which is in feature freeze). I'm hoping Bill Janssen can review this. -- assignee: -> janssen nosy: +gvanrossum, janssen __ Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

[issue1581] xmlrpclib.ServerProxy() doesn't use x509 data

New submission from Andreas Hasenack: I was trying to use xmlrpclib.ServerProxy() with https and client certificate validation (I know httplib doesn't do server certificate validation yet). I found no way to pass on host/uri as a (host,x509_dict) tuple as the connection methods support, so I came