[issue15865] reflect bare star * in function signature documentation

2012-09-08 Thread Ezio Melotti
Ezio Melotti added the comment: Fixed, thanks for the patch! -- assignee: docs@python -> ezio.melotti resolution: -> fixed stage: patch review -> committed/rejected status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker __

[issue15865] reflect bare star * in function signature documentation

2012-09-08 Thread Roundup Robot
Roundup Robot added the comment: New changeset a30b3915228b by Ezio Melotti in branch '3.2': #15865: add "*" in the signature to document keyword-only args in the docs. Patch by Chris Jerdonek. http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/a30b3915228b New changeset 694c725f241a by Ezio Melotti in branch '

[issue15865] reflect bare star * in function signature documentation

2012-09-07 Thread Chris Jerdonek
Chris Jerdonek added the comment: Here is an updated patch that incorporates Terry's suggestion. -- Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file27145/issue-15865-2.patch ___ Python tracker __

[issue15865] reflect bare star * in function signature documentation

2012-09-07 Thread Chris Jerdonek
Chris Jerdonek added the comment: Thanks, Terry. If anyone is curious, it looks like the verbose keyword argument was added to the docs (and to threading.py) in revision f71acc4b2341, and then subsequently removed (but not from the docs) in revision 8ec51b2e57c2. > (The fact that we found 2 d

[issue15865] reflect bare star * in function signature documentation

2012-09-07 Thread Terry J. Reedy
Terry J. Reedy added the comment: By looking at x.py, I confirmed that the added stars are correct. Also, the correction of 'header' to 'hdr' is correct. However, for threading.py in 3.3.0, I see class Thread: ... def __init__(self, group=None, target=None, name=None, args=

[issue15865] reflect bare star * in function signature documentation

2012-09-05 Thread Chris Jerdonek
Changes by Chris Jerdonek : -- keywords: +needs review stage: needs patch -> patch review ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list

[issue15865] reflect bare star * in function signature documentation

2012-09-05 Thread Chris Jerdonek
Chris Jerdonek added the comment: Actually, it looks like configparser is the *only* file with missing single *'s. :) However, I did find a few other typos in the process of checking those signatures in the other files. Patch attached. -- keywords: +patch Added file: http://bugs.pyth

[issue15865] reflect bare star * in function signature documentation

2012-09-05 Thread Chris Jerdonek
Chris Jerdonek added the comment: > So is the root problem that Sphinx does not handle keyword-only arguments? I don't think so. Sphinx renders the * just fine. It's just that in some of the reST files, the * was left out. -- ___ Python tracker <

[issue15865] reflect bare star * in function signature documentation

2012-09-05 Thread Éric Araujo
Éric Araujo added the comment: So is the root problem that Sphinx does not handle keyword-only arguments? -- versions: +Python 3.2 ___ Python tracker ___

[issue15865] reflect bare star * in function signature documentation

2012-09-05 Thread Ezio Melotti
Changes by Ezio Melotti : -- nosy: +eric.araujo, georg.brandl stage: -> needs patch ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list maili

[issue15865] reflect bare star * in function signature documentation

2012-09-04 Thread Chris Jerdonek
New submission from Chris Jerdonek: This issue is to make sure that the bare * in the function signatures of pure Python functions is properly reflected in the documentation. This will bring the signatures in the documentation closer to the signatures that we have in the Python code -- a goal