New submission from Mark Lawrence:
For http://docs.python.org/howto/unicode.html (that's Python 2.7.3) and
http://docs.python.org/release/3.1.5/howto/unicode.html the first paragraph
states (This HOWTO has not yet been updated to cover the 3.x versions of
Python.). I suggest this is changed
Chris Jerdonek added the comment:
I wonder why the note must be there at all. None of the 2.x docs have been
updated to cover the 3.x versions of Python. Otherwise, every 2.x page could
use such a disclaimer.
Here is where the note was added:
http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/bdef454f7212
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
I'd happily settle on seeing this historical note removed from the 2.7.3 docs.
I'm unsure about the best approach for 3.1.5. Who's done the most work on
unicode to answer this one, someone working on #16061 possibly?
--
Martin v. Löwis added the comment:
I don't think there is a need to update the 3.1.x version of the documentation
in that respect.
--
nosy: +loewis
versions: +Python 3.3, Python 3.4 -Python 3.1
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
Martin v. Löwis added the comment:
Before the disclaimer can be removed, all statements of the document should be
reviewed. From a shallow glance, the section on Python 2.x's support should
be changed to Python's support. The reference to Marc-Andre Lemburg's
presentation should be removed,
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
See also #4153
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue16227
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Changes by Ezio Melotti ezio.melo...@gmail.com:
--
components: +Unicode
nosy: +ezio.melotti
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue16227
___
Chris Jerdonek added the comment:
I don't think there is a need to update the 3.1.x version of the
documentation in that respect.
versions: +Python 3.3, Python 3.4 -Python 3.1
This issue was just about the 2.7 version. 3.x doesn't contain the language
mentioned by the original commenter.
Chris Jerdonek added the comment:
3.x doesn't contain the language mentioned by the original commenter.
3.2 onwards I mean.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue16227
___
Martin v. Löwis added the comment:
Ah, I missed that.
I'm skeptical that the proposed change is an improvement - how would the reader
know how to find version 1.12 of the document? I'm also skeptical that removal
of the note in 2.7 is useful: people finding the document in Google would
Chris Jerdonek added the comment:
That proposal sounds fine to me.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue16227
___
___
Python-bugs-list
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
The mvl proposal fine by me too, thanks guys.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue16227
___
___
12 matches
Mail list logo