[issue16325] PEP 8 refers to reference to PEP 8

Ezio Melotti added the comment: I applied the patch and removed the two sentences: http://hg.python.org/peps/rev/be77365934e7 -- assignee: docs@python -> ezio.melotti resolution: -> fixed stage: patch review -> committed/rejected status: open -> closed type: behavior -> enhancement __

[issue16325] PEP 8 refers to reference to PEP 8

Terry J. Reedy added the comment: "Where there's conflict, Guido's style rules for the purposes of this PEP." I think this sentence should go. The only way that I can make sense of it is that Guido's and Barry's documents have rules that are not in PEP 8 and that if they conflict, Guido's wins

[issue16325] PEP 8 refers to reference to PEP 8

Serhiy Storchaka added the comment: LGTM, but I'm not well competent to assess these changes. -- ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bug

[issue16325] PEP 8 refers to reference to PEP 8

Ezio Melotti added the comment: Do you think something like the attached patch would be OK? -- keywords: +patch stage: -> patch review Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file27714/issue16325.diff ___ Python tracker

[issue16325] PEP 8 refers to reference to PEP 8

Serhiy Storchaka added the comment: I think there is no sense to refer to removed document. If Guido's original essay saved somewhere, than PEP 8 should refer to this copy. Otherwise meaningless link should be removed. -- ___ Python tracker

[issue16325] PEP 8 refers to reference to PEP 8

Ezio Melotti added the comment: The link might still be OK, otherwise we could copy the note directly in the PEP. -- nosy: +ezio.melotti ___ Python tracker ___ _

[issue16325] PEP 8 refers to reference to PEP 8

New submission from Serhiy Storchaka: PEP 8 refers to Guido's original Python Style Guide essay (http://www.python.org/doc/essays/styleguide.html), but the essay was removed, only link to PEP 8 (and PEP 257) left. -- assignee: docs@python components: Documentation messages: 173773 nosy