subject:"\[issue1643370\] recursive urlparse"

[issue1643370] recursive urlparse

2010-07-01 Thread R. David Murray

R. David Murray added the comment: Anatoly, when I said I was closing the issue for lack of interest, I meant that you had not produced a candidate patch, and no one else had shown any interest in creating one. If you wish to produce a candidate patch we can reopen the issue (though I do thi

[issue1643370] recursive urlparse

2010-07-01 Thread Éric Araujo

Changes by Éric Araujo : -- nosy: +merwok ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.

[issue1643370] recursive urlparse

2010-07-01 Thread Georg Brandl

Georg Brandl added the comment: Why shouldn't you be eligible to produce patches to Python? And yes, requests without patches will sometimes take longer, or be evaluated differently, since we're all volunteers here, and an existing patch, even if unusable it the submitted form, often makes work

[issue1643370] recursive urlparse

2010-07-01 Thread anatoly techtonik

anatoly techtonik added the comment: Too bad that request from users who are not eligible to produce a patch are not accepted by Python "community". =/ -- ___ Python tracker

[issue1643370] recursive urlparse

2010-07-01 Thread Senthil Kumaran

Senthil Kumaran added the comment: David, Is the stage "unit test needed" proper for this or was it by mistake? Anatoly, I thought closing this feature request was fine, because I considered that with namedtuple the desired attributes of url's were obtained as ParsedTuple object (check test_u

[issue1643370] recursive urlparse

2010-06-30 Thread R. David Murray

R. David Murray added the comment: Since no patch has been proposed since 2007, I think it is time to close this feature request for lack of interest. In any case I think this functionality would be better situated in a Python3 URI/IRI parsing module with a full object model for the IRI, whic

[issue1643370] recursive urlparse

2010-06-29 Thread anatoly techtonik

anatoly techtonik added the comment: Senthil, please read the proposals more attentively. From the docs of urlparse at http://docs.python.org/library/urlparse.html "The components are not broken up in smaller parts (for example, the network location is a single string), and % escapes are not

[issue1643370] recursive urlparse

2010-06-29 Thread Senthil Kumaran

Senthil Kumaran added the comment: This is already handled via namedtuple in the urlparse. All the parts of the url are available by parsing. -- resolution: -> out of date stage: unit test needed -> committed/rejected status: open -> closed ___ Pyt