[issue16784] Int tests enhancement and refactoring

Change by Irit Katriel : -- resolution: -> fixed stage: needs patch -> resolved status: pending -> closed ___ Python tracker ___ __

[issue16784] Int tests enhancement and refactoring

Irit Katriel added the comment: It seems that all dependencies are complete, so if nobody will object I will close this too. -- nosy: +iritkatriel status: open -> pending ___ Python tracker

[issue16784] Int tests enhancement and refactoring

Change by Mark Lawrence : -- nosy: -BreamoreBoy ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail

[issue16784] Int tests enhancement and refactoring

Mark Lawrence added the comment: is there anything left to do here? -- nosy: +BreamoreBoy ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list

[issue16784] Int tests enhancement and refactoring

Chris Jerdonek added the comment: Improvement of int/long tests should also be reflected in the Tests section of Misc/NEWS. An entry wasn't added in issue 16045. For linking purposes, this issue number would probably be the best to use for such an entry. -- _

[issue16784] Int tests enhancement and refactoring

Chris Jerdonek added the comment: Another task: backport the tests for current behavior added under issue 16772 (e.g. test_int_base_limits() tests). -- ___ Python tracker ___ __

[issue16784] Int tests enhancement and refactoring

Changes by Serhiy Storchaka : -- dependencies: +Get rid of deprecated assertEquals etc in tests ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs

[issue16784] Int tests enhancement and refactoring

Changes by Serhiy Storchaka : -- dependencies: +Mark small ints test as CPython-only ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list maili

[issue16784] Int tests enhancement and refactoring

Chris Jerdonek added the comment: Agreed. I just didn't want it to be a requirement of beginning shared tests in case anyone objects to refactoring existing tests in 2.7 -- as opposed to using it for the addition of new tests. -- ___ Python tracker

[issue16784] Int tests enhancement and refactoring

Serhiy Storchaka added the comment: A large part of IntTestCases.test_basic() and LongTest.test_long() can be shared, as a number of smaller tests. -- ___ Python tracker ___ ___

[issue16784] Int tests enhancement and refactoring

Chris Jerdonek added the comment: I created issue 16790 to allow the sharing of tests between test_int and test_long in 2.7. I don't think issue 16761 and issue 16772 should be prerequisites to this issue though because both issues could benefit from issue 16790 being committed first (since b

[issue16784] Int tests enhancement and refactoring

Changes by Ezio Melotti : -- nosy: +ezio.melotti ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.py

[issue16784] Int tests enhancement and refactoring

Chris Jerdonek added the comment: Other things that should be done include porting the more comprehensive tests in a recent changeset from 2.7 to 3.x and refactoring the try-except of one of the tests as necessary (see the Rietveld comments of issue 16761 for details on both). The various iss

[issue16784] Int tests enhancement and refactoring

Changes by Serhiy Storchaka : -- dependencies: +Fix int(base=X), int() accepts float number base nosy: +chris.jerdonek ___ Python tracker ___

[issue16784] Int tests enhancement and refactoring

New submission from Serhiy Storchaka: Int tests should be synchronized between different Python versions. Tests for int and long should be synchronized in 2.7. Common code for int and long tests should be shared in 2.7. CPython tests (i.e. small int identity) should be extracted to separated m