Barry A. Warsaw added the comment:
On Mar 09, 2013, at 03:30 AM, Terry J. Reedy wrote:
I think you are, in effect, asking for expansion of the 'PEP Header Preamble'
section of PEP-0001. I have added some of the PEP editors listed in the PEP
as nosy. I will let them decide if this should be
Terry J. Reedy added the comment:
I think an optional section header, Related PEPs, to go either at the top or
bottom (the two places of most prominence) whould be better than a header with
a list of numbers. A section could have a sentence or two for each listing
describing the perceived
Terry J. Reedy added the comment:
I think you are, in effect, asking for expansion of the 'PEP Header Preamble'
section of PEP-0001. I have added some of the PEP editors listed in the PEP as
nosy. I will let them decide if this should be discussed elsewhere.
--
nosy: +barry,
Brandon Craig Rhodes added the comment:
(Corrected not to note in the title and went with enhancement)
--
title: PEP should not if it has been superseded - PEP should note if it has
been superseded
type: - enhancement
___
Python tracker
Brandon Craig Rhodes added the comment:
The original inspiration:
https://twitter.com/theomn/status/309468740611891200
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue17370
___
Changes by Owen Nelson onel...@gmail.com:
--
nosy: +Owen.Nelson
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue17370
___
___
Python-bugs-list
