[issue17477] update the bsddb module do build with db 5.x versions

Jesús Cea Avión added the comment: Time to die. -- resolution: -> wont fix stage: needs patch -> resolved status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker ___

[issue17477] update the bsddb module do build with db 5.x versions

Change by Mark Lawrence : -- nosy: -BreamoreBoy ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe:

[issue17477] update the bsddb module do build with db 5.x versions

Mark Lawrence added the comment: From http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/database/database-technologies/berkeleydb/downloads/index.html the latest version is 6.1.23. Given the extended life span of 2.7 I'd assume that the patch here is worth updating. See also #18734. -- nosy:

[issue17477] update the bsddb module do build with db 5.x versions

Changes by Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis arfrever@gmail.com: -- nosy: +Arfrever ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue17477 ___

[issue17477] update the bsddb module do build with db 5.x versions

Jesús Cea Avión added the comment: This patch is incorrect. It doesn't compile with Berkeley DB 5.x at all, and it doesn't allow to compile against 4.4-4.9 (previously supported). So currently it is a bit regression. Check bug #18734. -- nosy: +Eddie.Stanley resolution: fixed -

[issue17477] update the bsddb module do build with db 5.x versions

Jesús Cea Avión added the comment: Note also that reusing my pybsddb project you are dropping support for several old releases of Berkeley DB that where supported by Python 2.7.4. If somebody were using it, they are left dead in the water, just because doing a minor Python upgrade.

[issue17477] update the bsddb module do build with db 5.x versions

Matthias Klose added the comment: was released with 2.7.4. -- resolution: - fixed stage: patch review - committed/rejected status: open - closed ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue17477

[issue17477] update the bsddb module do build with db 5.x versions

Changes by Gregory P. Smith g...@krypto.org: -- nosy: +jcea -gregory.p.smith ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue17477 ___ ___

[issue17477] update the bsddb module do build with db 5.x versions

Changes by Matthias Klose d...@debian.org: Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file29475/bsddb.diff ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue17477 ___

[issue17477] update the bsddb module do build with db 5.x versions

Changes by Matthias Klose d...@debian.org: Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file29487/bsddb.diff ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue17477 ___

[issue17477] update the bsddb module do build with db 5.x versions

Gregory P. Smith added the comment: fyi, I un-cc'd myself as I don't maintain this module anymore; jcea does. :) I agree with the patch. Support for anything older than 4.3 is completely pointless in 2.7 and supporting 5.x is likely required for future OS distros wanting to ship 2.7.

[issue17477] update the bsddb module do build with db 5.x versions

Roundup Robot added the comment: New changeset 83fd64c97296 by doko in branch '2.7': - Issue #17477: Update the bsddb module to pybsddb 5.3.0, supporting http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/83fd64c97296 New changeset df9d2adafc2c by doko in branch '2.7': Reindent files for:

[issue17477] update the bsddb module do build with db 5.x versions

Matthias Klose added the comment: checked the update with 4.6, 5.1 and 5.3 builds. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue17477 ___ ___

[issue17477] update the bsddb module do build with db 5.x versions

Jesús Cea Avión added the comment: Berkeley DB 6.0 is inminent. A month or two. Is this a backport as-is of the external pybsddb3 5.3.0 code I maintain?. If that is the case, could be some incompatibilities with current bsddb module in stock 2.7. I don't care (a lot) anymore keeping

[issue17477] update the bsddb module do build with db 5.x versions

Changes by Gregory P. Smith g...@krypto.org: -- nosy: -gregory.p.smith ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue17477 ___ ___

[issue17477] update the bsddb module do build with db 5.x versions

Matthias Klose added the comment: Is this a backport as-is of the external pybsddb3 5.3.0 code I maintain?. If that is the case, could be some incompatibilities with current bsddb module in stock 2.7. yes. Could you point me to these possible incompatibilities? Afaics all test cases did

[issue17477] update the bsddb module do build with db 5.x versions

New submission from Matthias Klose: the bsddb module is still supported in 2.7, however only builds using db versions up to 4.8, which at least some Linux distributions ship anymore. Proposing to update the bsddb module to pybsddb 5.3.0, which supports to build using db up to 5.3.0. The

[issue17477] update the bsddb module do build with db 5.x versions

Changes by Matthias Klose d...@debian.org: -- keywords: +patch Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file29475/bsddb.diff ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue17477 ___

[issue17477] update the bsddb module do build with db 5.x versions

Changes by Matthias Klose d...@debian.org: -- nosy: +barry, benjamin.peterson, dmalcolm, gregory.p.smith ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue17477 ___