[issue17745] "packaging" no longer planned to be included

2013-10-06 Thread Georg Brandl
Georg Brandl added the comment: Currently we have packaging listed as "deferred to post-3.3" which is certainly not wrong. -- resolution: -> works for me status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker

[issue17745] "packaging" no longer planned to be included

2013-04-19 Thread Tshepang Lekhonkhobe
Tshepang Lekhonkhobe added the comment: There should at least be a mention that 'packaging' is no longer planned to be included, to avoid any confusion/misinformation. -- ___ Python tracker ___

[issue17745] "packaging" no longer planned to be included

2013-04-19 Thread Éric Araujo
Éric Araujo added the comment: The role of the PEP was to announce changes; I don’t know if changing it now is useful, as the release is done and its release notes are accurate. -- assignee: docs@python -> georg.brandl components: -Distutils, Distutils2, Documentation nosy: +eric.arauj

[issue17745] "packaging" no longer planned to be included

2013-04-16 Thread Antoine Pitrou
Changes by Antoine Pitrou : -- components: +Distutils, Distutils2 nosy: +alexis, tarek ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mai

[issue17745] "packaging" no longer planned to be included

2013-04-15 Thread Tshepang Lekhonkhobe
New submission from Tshepang Lekhonkhobe: attached patch reflects current reality (me assuming that PEPs are living documents) -- assignee: docs@python components: Documentation files: diff messages: 187040 nosy: docs@python, tshepang priority: normal severity: normal status: open title