[issue1855] Codepage unset in msilib.init_database()

2010-05-20 Thread Martin v . Löwis
Martin v. Löwis mar...@v.loewis.de added the comment: [The original link seems down; I found a similar description at http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa372049%28VS.85%29.aspx] I think you are misinterpreting the documentation. It doesn't say that the codepage property is required (in

[issue1855] Codepage unset in msilib.init_database()

2009-05-17 Thread Jim Wilson
Jim Wilson wil...@afn.org added the comment: It's been more than a year. I'll work a little longer on the SetProperty(...) example, but here's the confirming evidence. A related problem is 1884, but I simply don't remember the context and long ago deleted the code in disgust. -- Added

[issue1855] Codepage unset in msilib.init_database()

2009-05-16 Thread Daniel Diniz
Changes by Daniel Diniz aja...@gmail.com: -- dependencies: +msilib.SetProperty(msilib.PID_CODEPAGE, '1252') raises 0x65d = type mismatch priority: normal - low stage: - test needed type: resource usage - feature request versions: +Python 2.7, Python 3.2 -Python 2.5

[issue1855] Codepage unset in msilib.init_database()

2008-01-16 Thread Jim Wilson
New submission from Jim Wilson: At http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa367864(VS.85,printer).aspx, Satanic Verses sayeth: The Codepage Summary property must be set before any string properties are set in the summary information., but so far as I can tell, PID_CODEPAGE is never used in

[issue1855] Codepage unset in msilib.init_database()

2008-01-16 Thread Christian Heimes
Changes by Christian Heimes: -- assignee: - loewis components: +Windows -Distutils nosy: +loewis priority: - normal type: - resource usage __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue1855 __