[issue19175] Erroneous reference to "integer" in format string grammar

Change by Cheryl Sabella : -- resolution: -> duplicate stage: -> resolved status: open -> closed superseder: -> Format mini-language integer definition is incorrect ___ Python tracker

[issue19175] Erroneous reference to integer in format string grammar

Changes by Georg Brandl ge...@python.org: -- assignee: docs@python - eric.smith nosy: +eric.smith ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue19175 ___

[issue19175] Erroneous reference to integer in format string grammar

Georg Brandl added the comment: The bug is that integer links to the integer production in the Python grammar. This shouldn't happen; I'll have a look on the Sphinx side. As a workaround, integer can be replaced by digit+ as requested (it occurs twice). -- nosy: +georg.brandl

[issue19175] Erroneous reference to integer in format string grammar

New submission from David Chambers: I first raised this issue on Stack Overflow: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/19203194 The [replacement field grammar][1] states that an [integer][2] is a valid field_name, but this is inaccurate: '{0}'.format('zero') 'zero'