Brett Cannon added the comment:
I don't think this is still needed as the importlib docs now has enough
examples to show people how to get to get similar results with a few method
calls.
--
resolution: -> out of date
stage: needs patch -> resolved
status: open -> closed
Eric Snow added the comment:
Yeah, waiting on this until 3.5 is fine with me. Arfrever brought it up so I
at least wanted to track it.
--
stage: - needs patch
versions: +Python 3.5 -Python 3.4
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
Brett Cannon added the comment:
I say just be patient and wait. No need to rush this as load_module() is still
allowed to exist and be used. And if I manage to create SpecLoader than even
new-fangled loaders and get load_module() for free.
--
___
New submission from Eric Snow:
In issue #19713, it came up that while PEP 451 deprecated Loader.load_module(),
it did not provide a suitable replacement for calling it directly. We've
worked around this in the stdlib by making calls to private APIs, but that
won't work so well for the
Changes by Eric Snow ericsnowcurren...@gmail.com:
--
nosy: +larry
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue20125
___
___
Python-bugs-list
