Antoine Pitrou added the comment:
Shouldn't this issue be closed?
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue21040
___
___
Python-bugs-list
Changes by Charles-François Natali cf.nat...@gmail.com:
--
status: open - closed
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue21040
___
___
Changes by Charles-François Natali cf.nat...@gmail.com:
--
resolution: - fixed
stage: patch review - committed/rejected
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue21040
___
STINNER Victor added the comment:
I sent a review on Rietveld.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue21040
___
___
Python-bugs-list
New submission from Charles-François Natali:
This patch updates the socketserver module to use selectors.
It's simpler, will use poll() when available, and also fixes a bug where the
timeout would not be recomputed upon EINTR.
Note that I removed an EINTR-handling test from test_socketserver
Changes by Charles-François Natali cf.nat...@gmail.com:
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file34593/socketserver_use_selectors-1.diff
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue21040
___
