Roundup Robot added the comment:
New changeset 34436ae65523 by Berker Peksag in branch 'default':
Issue #21338: Add silent mode for compileall.
https://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/34436ae65523
--
nosy: +python-dev
___
Python tracker
Berker Peksag added the comment:
Thanks for the patch, Thomas.
--
resolution: - fixed
stage: commit review - resolved
status: open - closed
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue21338
Berker Peksag added the comment:
Here's an updated patch. Thanks David.
--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file36808/issue21338.diff
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue21338
R. David Murray added the comment:
Berker: I had some review comments pending on the docs, but reitveld isn't
letting me publish them for some reason (it says the patch set doesn't exist).
The comments are: the method docs should probably say ``False`` or ``0`` (the
default) (and all the
Changes by Berker Peksag berker.pek...@gmail.com:
--
assignee: - berker.peksag
nosy: +berker.peksag
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue21338
___
Changes by R. David Murray rdmur...@bitdance.com:
--
nosy: +r.david.murray
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue21338
___
___
Éric Araujo added the comment:
Patch looks to me comprehensive and backward-compatible. Thanks Thomas!
--
nosy: +eric.araujo
stage: needs patch - commit review
type: - enhancement
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
New submission from Thomas Kluyver:
The compileall module's command line interface has a -q (quiet) flag which
suppresses most of the output, but it still prints error messages. I'd like an
entirely silent mode with no output.
My use case is byte-compiling Python files as part of a graphical
Ezio Melotti added the comment:
This seems a reasonable request. Do you want to propose a patch?
--
keywords: +easy
nosy: +ezio.melotti
stage: - needs patch
type: - enhancement
versions: +Python 3.5
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
Thomas Kluyver added the comment:
Patch attached.
This works by making the -q flag countable, so you pass -qq to suppress all
output. In the Python API, the quiet parameter has become an integer, so
passing 2 is equivalent to -qq. This should be fully backwards compatible with
passing True
Changes by Thomas Kluyver tak...@gmail.com:
Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file35012/compileall_silent.patch
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue21338
___
Steven D'Aprano added the comment:
Can't you just re-direct stdout or stderr? I'm sure that works even on Windows.
E.g.
py -${PY_QUALIFIER} -m compileall -q $INSTDIR\pkgs 2 null
Is there a reason you cannot do this? I think that adding functionality to
compileall to duplicate what your OS
Thomas Kluyver added the comment:
Sorry, I somehow attached an old version of the patch. This one should be
correct.
Steven: Redirection relies on a shell - the native 'run a process' interface
that the installer uses can't do that. There are ways to work around this, but
I think this
Changes by Thomas Kluyver tak...@gmail.com:
Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file35013/compileall_silent.patch
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue21338
___
Thomas Kluyver added the comment:
Gah, still wrong. Trying again.
--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file35014/compileall_silent.patch
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue21338
Thomas Kluyver added the comment:
In fact, I will probably end up working around this anyway, because I'll have
to support versions of Python without this fix for some time. So I don't feel
strongly that it needs to go in, but I will do any revisions or changes
requested if people think it
16 matches
Mail list logo
