[issue26347] BoundArguments.apply_defaults doesn't handle empty arguments

2016-03-02 Thread Roundup Robot
Roundup Robot added the comment: New changeset 94879997ea5f by Yury Selivanov in branch '3.5': inspect: Fix BoundArguments.apply_defaults to handle empty arguments https://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/94879997ea5f New changeset 779a0d51f7e2 by Yury Selivanov in branch 'default': Merge 3.5 (issue

[issue26347] BoundArguments.apply_defaults doesn't handle empty arguments

2016-02-16 Thread Frederick Wagner
Frederick Wagner added the comment: All right, looks like I have the asterisk now! Looking forward to officially contributing to the Python standard library :) -- ___ Python tracker

[issue26347] BoundArguments.apply_defaults doesn't handle empty arguments

2016-02-12 Thread Yury Selivanov
Yury Selivanov added the comment: Hi Frederick, the patch looks good. Thanks for reporting this! Could you please sign the contributor agreement so that I can commit your patch? -- assignee: -> yselivanov nosy: +yselivanov ___ Python tracker

[issue26347] BoundArguments.apply_defaults doesn't handle empty arguments

2016-02-11 Thread Frederick Wagner
New submission from Frederick Wagner: [First-time contributor, feedback appreciated.] Found and fixed some unexpected behavior in inspect.BoundArguments.apply_defaults. Simplest explanation is the following test that I added: # Make sure a no-args binding still acquires proper

[issue26347] BoundArguments.apply_defaults doesn't handle empty arguments

2016-02-11 Thread Martin Panter
Martin Panter added the comment: Patch looks good to me -- nosy: +martin.panter stage: -> patch review ___ Python tracker ___