Changes by Brett Cannon br...@python.org:
--
resolution: - out of date
status: open - closed
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue2744
___
Mark Lawrence breamore...@yahoo.co.uk added the comment:
Nobody has responded to msg109475 so I'll close unless there are any objections.
--
priority: high - normal
status: open - pending
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
Mark Dickinson dicki...@gmail.com added the comment:
I'll close unless there are any objections.
Yes, I object! :)
If there's still a bug present, it seems inappropriate to close this issue. So
as a first step, someone needs to look at this closely to determine whether
there *is* still a
Mark Lawrence breamore...@yahoo.co.uk added the comment:
Is there anybody who can run with this as it's been in limbo for over two years?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: +Python 2.7, Python 3.2
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
Changes by Benjamin Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
--
priority: critical - high
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue2744
___
___
Benjamin Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Done in r66817.
--
resolution: - fixed
status: open - closed
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue2744
___
Alexandre Vassalotti [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Have you verified the numbers? They don't look right to me.
The problem is the 2nd argument of cProfile's constructor has a
different semantic meaning than the one for profile.py. For profile.py,
it is used to set the bias (I presume it
Benjamin Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
No, I didn't look too hard at it; I just got it scraping along, so I can
forward port a fix for it. I'll reopen this, so you can take more
action, so you wish. :)
--
resolution: fixed -
status: closed - open
Alexandre Vassalotti [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Unassigning myself as I don't have the time to fix this properly.
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue2744
___
Changes by Alexandre Vassalotti [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
--
assignee: alexandre.vassalotti -
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue2744
___
___
Brett Cannon [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
So is this going to be a 3.1 issue or a 3.0 one? If it's the former then
it should not be a release blocker. But if is going to be for 3.0 then
the version list is wrong.
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changes by Neal Norwitz [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
--
priority: critical - release blocker
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue2744
___
___
Changes by Benjamin Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
--
versions: +Python 3.1 -Python 3.0
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue2744
___
___
Benjamin Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Alexandre, are you still computerless?
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue2744
___
___
Alexandre Vassalotti [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
I will try to fix this one with profile/cProfile merge.
--
assignee: - alexandre.vassalotti
nosy: +alexandre.vassalotti
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue2744
Brett Cannon [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
A key thing to realize is that test_cprofile has heavily changed in
2.6 compared to what is currently disabled in 3.0.
--
nosy: +brett.cannon
__
Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue2744
New submission from Benjamin Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
test_cProfile has been disabled in Py3k for a while now. It should be
fixed before release.
--
messages: 66131
nosy: benjamin.peterson
priority: critical
severity: normal
status: open
title: Fix test_cProfile
versions: Python 3.0
17 matches
Mail list logo
