[issue2863] Generator __name__ and better repr()

Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: Changed in r63364. __ Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe:

[issue2863] Generator __name__ and better repr()

Alexander Belopolsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: Any reason why generator object repr is formed differently from function and code? >>> def f(): yield 1 ... >>> f() >>> f >>> f.__code__ ", line 1> -- nosy: +belopolsky __ Tracker <[EMAIL PROT

[issue2863] Generator __name__ and better repr()

Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: Okay, committed as r63320. -- resolution: -> accepted status: open -> closed __ Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> __

[issue2863] Generator __name__ and better repr()

svncodereview <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: Dear report, New code review comments by GvR have been published. Please go to http://codereview.appspot.com/1046 to read them. Message: Looks good to me. Details: Issue Description: http://bugs.python.org/issue2863 Sincerely, Your frie

[issue2863] Generator __name__ and better repr()

New submission from Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: As discussed on python-ideas: http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-ideas/2008-May/001570.html -- assignee: gvanrossum components: Interpreter Core files: gen-name.diff keywords: patch, patch messages: 66859 nosy: georg.brandl, gvan