[issue28898] Can't compile gdb with Python 3.6

Ned Deily added the comment: [cherrypicked for 3.6.0rc2] -- assignee: ned.deily -> priority: release blocker -> resolution: -> fixed stage: -> resolved status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker

[issue28898] Can't compile gdb with Python 3.6

Roundup Robot added the comment: New changeset d6c8803c55b4 by Benjamin Peterson in branch '3.6': guard HAVE_LONG_LONG definition to prevent redefinition (#28898) https://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/d6c8803c55b4 New changeset 9d0765c22bed by Ned Deily in branch '3.6': Issue #28898: add Misc/NEWS e

[issue28898] Can't compile gdb with Python 3.6

STINNER Victor added the comment: > Why do you think this change caused that breakage? That bot looks like it's > been broken for days. This change should have no behavior change whatsoever > for Python itself. It's right that the buildbot is broken for years: https://mail.python.org/pipermail

[issue28898] Can't compile gdb with Python 3.6

Benjamin Peterson added the comment: Why do you think this change caused that breakage? That bot looks like it's been broken for days. This change should have no behavior change whatsoever for Python itself. -- ___ Python tracker

[issue28898] Can't compile gdb with Python 3.6

STINNER Victor added the comment: The OpenIndiana uses gcc and has the long long type. Extract of the ./configure script: --- checking for gcc... gcc (...) checking size of long long... 8 --- http://buildbot.python.org/all/builders/AMD64%20OpenIndiana%203.x/builds/37/steps/configure/logs/stdio

[issue28898] Can't compile gdb with Python 3.6

STINNER Victor added the comment: Oh, the problem has introduced a crash on OpenIndiana: --- Fatal Python error: Aborted Current thread 0x0001 (most recent call first): File "/export/home/buildbot/64bits/3.x.cea-indiana-amd64/build/Lib/ctypes/__init__.py", line 273 in _reset_cach

[issue28898] Can't compile gdb with Python 3.6

STINNER Victor added the comment: The pushed change 4745d801cae2 LGTM for a cherry-pick in 3.6.0. -- nosy: +haypo ___ Python tracker ___ _

[issue28898] Can't compile gdb with Python 3.6

Benjamin Peterson added the comment: I think we should take this for 3.6. -- assignee: -> ned.deily nosy: +ned.deily priority: normal -> release blocker ___ Python tracker ___ _

[issue28898] Can't compile gdb with Python 3.6

Roundup Robot added the comment: New changeset 4745d801cae2 by Benjamin Peterson in branch '3.6': guard HAVE_LONG_LONG definition to prevent redefinition (#28898) https://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/4745d801cae2 New changeset 1afc3f4f5502 by Benjamin Peterson in branch 'default': merge 3.6 (#28898

[issue28898] Can't compile gdb with Python 3.6

Changes by Ned Deily : -- keywords: +3.6regression -patch ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https

[issue28898] Can't compile gdb with Python 3.6

Changes by Serhiy Storchaka : -- nosy: +benjamin.peterson ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https

[issue28898] Can't compile gdb with Python 3.6

New submission from Charalampos Stratakis: Trying to compile gdb, with python support and by having it depend on Python 3.6 produces an error that the HAVE_LONG_LONG has been redefined [0]. This seems to have been introduced by this commit [1]. I'm in no way expert on gdb, but from what I coul