[issue3006] subprocess.Popen causes socket to remain open after close

2013-05-20 Thread Charles-François Natali
Charles-François Natali added the comment: It's fixed now that subprocess defaults to close_fds=True. -- resolution: - out of date stage: - committed/rejected status: open - closed ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org

[issue3006] subprocess.Popen causes socket to remain open after close

2011-06-12 Thread Terry J. Reedy
Changes by Terry J. Reedy tjre...@udel.edu: -- versions: +Python 3.3 -Python 2.6, Python 3.1 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue3006 ___

[issue3006] subprocess.Popen causes socket to remain open after close

2011-01-12 Thread Charles-Francois Natali
Charles-Francois Natali neolo...@free.fr added the comment: I cannot figure out why the closesocket's graceful shutdown is waiting for the Popen command to complete. It doesn't. Your main process closes its socket. You could see it with a netstat/lsof (don't know under Windows). The problem

[issue3006] subprocess.Popen causes socket to remain open after close

2010-05-11 Thread Terry J. Reedy
Changes by Terry J. Reedy tjre...@udel.edu: -- versions: +Python 2.7, Python 3.1, Python 3.2 -Python 3.0 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue3006 ___

[issue3006] subprocess.Popen causes socket to remain open after close

2008-08-26 Thread Nicolas Grilly
Changes by Nicolas Grilly [EMAIL PROTECTED]: -- nosy: +ngrilly ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue3006 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list

[issue3006] subprocess.Popen causes socket to remain open after close

2008-08-15 Thread Antoine Pitrou
Antoine Pitrou [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: It's not perfect--another thread could still spawn a subprocess in between Then it could be done in socketmodule.c, when still holding the GIL. Python code can change back the socket to inheritable afterwards if it wants to. We probably

[issue3006] subprocess.Popen causes socket to remain open after close

2008-08-01 Thread Kevin Watters
Kevin Watters [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: I found a workaround for this issue (attached) via the kernel32.dll function SetHandleInformation. You can patch the socket class to set all newly created sockets as uninheritable. It's not perfect--another thread could still spawn a subprocess

[issue3006] subprocess.Popen causes socket to remain open after close

2008-07-30 Thread Kevin Watters
Changes by Kevin Watters [EMAIL PROTECTED]: -- nosy: +kevinwatters ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue3006 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing

[issue3006] subprocess.Popen causes socket to remain open after close

2008-05-29 Thread Matt Mulsow
New submission from Matt Mulsow [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Windows, when a suprocess.Popen command is issued while a socket connection is being handled the socket connection will not close until the output of the subprocess is consumed. The connection remains open even though the request.close()