[issue3035] Removing apparently unwanted functions from Tkinter

2012-03-31 Thread Roundup Robot
Roundup Robot devn...@psf.upfronthosting.co.za added the comment: New changeset 2bc374182ed4 by Andrew Svetlov in branch 'default': issue #3035: update PendingDeprecationWarning to DeprectionWarning, point deprecation in tkinter doc http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/2bc374182ed4 --

[issue3035] Removing apparently unwanted functions from Tkinter

2012-03-31 Thread Andrew Svetlov
Andrew Svetlov andrew.svet...@gmail.com added the comment: I've updated the patch following David's recommendations, pushed it into default branch. #14446 has been made to remove deprecated code in 3.4 Closing the issue as fixed. -- resolution: remind - fixed status: open - closed

[issue3035] Removing apparently unwanted functions from Tkinter

2012-03-29 Thread Andrew Svetlov
Andrew Svetlov andrew.svet...@gmail.com added the comment: Updated patch. Warning type is DeprecationWarning, docs mentioned that. -- Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file25067/issue3035.diff ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org

[issue3035] Removing apparently unwanted functions from Tkinter

2012-03-29 Thread Andrew Svetlov
Changes by Andrew Svetlov andrew.svet...@gmail.com: -- stage: - patch review ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue3035 ___ ___

[issue3035] Removing apparently unwanted functions from Tkinter

2012-03-29 Thread R. David Murray
R. David Murray rdmur...@bitdance.com added the comment: Raymond is suggesting removal in 3.4, and given that we are doing it I don't see any reason to wait for 3.5, either, so you probably want to update the warning messages to say 3.4 instead of 3.5. Otherwise it looks good to me. Ezio

[issue3035] Removing apparently unwanted functions from Tkinter

2012-03-29 Thread Andrew Svetlov
Andrew Svetlov andrew.svet...@gmail.com added the comment: Thank you, David. I've updated the patch. I think making new test for check is easy but Issue14446 is good enough. Running stupid test doesn't make sense for this case. -- Added file:

[issue3035] Removing apparently unwanted functions from Tkinter

2012-03-23 Thread Raymond Hettinger
Raymond Hettinger raymond.hettin...@gmail.com added the comment: Usually, I would counsel against removing anything that isn't broken by design, but the code for these functions offers nothing substantive. So, +1 for marking as deprecated in 3.3 and removing in 3.4. -- nosy:

[issue3035] Removing apparently unwanted functions from Tkinter

2012-03-22 Thread Andrew Svetlov
Andrew Svetlov andrew.svet...@gmail.com added the comment: David Murray, I used to think what deprecation process in Python have to go trough PendingDeprectaionWarning to DeprecationWarning and removing in next next release at end. Is it right? Also I thought what that trivial patch does not

[issue3035] Removing apparently unwanted functions from Tkinter

2012-03-22 Thread R. David Murray
R. David Murray rdmur...@bitdance.com added the comment: You are theoretically right about not posting trivial patches, but as you can see, sometimes even a trivial patch elicits unexpected insights. So I like to always post my patches, even the seemingly trivial ones. Then if I don't get

[issue3035] Removing apparently unwanted functions from Tkinter

2012-03-21 Thread Andrew Svetlov
Changes by Andrew Svetlov andrew.svet...@gmail.com: -- nosy: +asvetlov ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue3035 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list

[issue3035] Removing apparently unwanted functions from Tkinter

2012-03-21 Thread Andrew Svetlov
Andrew Svetlov andrew.svet...@gmail.com added the comment: Pushed as PendingDepricationWarnings for upcoming 3.3 -- assignee: - asvetlov resolution: - remind stage: patch review - versions: +Python 3.3, Python 3.4 -Python 3.2 ___ Python tracker

[issue3035] Removing apparently unwanted functions from Tkinter

2012-03-21 Thread Roundup Robot
Roundup Robot devn...@psf.upfronthosting.co.za added the comment: New changeset d42f264f291e by Andrew Svetlov in branch 'default': Issue #3035: Unused functions from tkinter are marked as pending peprecated. http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/d42f264f291e -- nosy: +python-dev

[issue3035] Removing apparently unwanted functions from Tkinter

2012-03-21 Thread R. David Murray
R. David Murray rdmur...@bitdance.com added the comment: PendingDeprecationWarning would mean that we are going to remove it someday. If you actually want to remove them in a reasonable time, you should use DeprecationWarning in 3.3, and then remove them in 3.4. But is there a need to remove

[issue3035] Removing apparently unwanted functions from Tkinter

2012-03-21 Thread R. David Murray
R. David Murray rdmur...@bitdance.com added the comment: Also, posting a patch for review before committing is a good idea. If you don't get a review in a reasonable time period, then as a committer you can of course go ahead and commit, based on your judgement. --

[issue3035] Removing apparently unwanted functions from Tkinter

2012-03-21 Thread Terry J. Reedy
Terry J. Reedy tjre...@udel.edu added the comment: I do not know or directly use tkinter enough to judge the proposed removal. (Although they do look like they might be useless.) I would like to see a little more explanation on the record. Who wrote # XXX I don't like these -- take them away?

[issue3035] Removing apparently unwanted functions from Tkinter

2010-01-13 Thread Brian Curtin
Brian Curtin cur...@acm.org added the comment: If this stuff needs to be removed it should probably go through the deprecation process. -- keywords: +needs review nosy: +brian.curtin priority: - low stage: - patch review type: - behavior versions: +Python 3.2 -Python 3.0

[issue3035] Removing apparently unwanted functions from Tkinter

2008-06-03 Thread Guilherme Polo
New submission from Guilherme Polo [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Patch for removing some unwanted, and probably not used, functions at tkinter/__init__. -- components: Tkinter files: removed_index_funcs.diff keywords: patch, patch messages: 67669 nosy: gpolo severity: normal status: open title: