[issue32506] dataclasses: no need for OrderedDict now that dict guarantees to keep insertion order

Change by Eric V. Smith : -- dependencies: -Dict order is now guaranteed, so add tests and doc for it resolution: -> fixed stage: patch review -> resolved status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker

[issue32506] dataclasses: no need for OrderedDict now that dict guarantees to keep insertion order

Eric V. Smith added the comment: New changeset d13889214a4c81b78fa8683d35bdbd17ff22f4fe by Eric V. Smith in branch 'master': bpo-32506: Change dataclasses from OrderedDict to plain dict. (gh-5131)

[issue32506] dataclasses: no need for OrderedDict now that dict guarantees to keep insertion order

Change by Eric V. Smith : -- pull_requests: +4992 ___ Python tracker ___ ___

[issue32506] dataclasses: no need for OrderedDict now that dict guarantees to keep insertion order

Change by Eric V. Smith : -- keywords: +patch pull_requests: +4991 stage: -> patch review ___ Python tracker ___

[issue32506] dataclasses: no need for OrderedDict now that dict guarantees to keep insertion order

Change by Serhiy Storchaka : -- components: +Library (Lib) dependencies: +Dict order is now guaranteed, so add tests and doc for it ___ Python tracker

[issue32506] dataclasses: no need for OrderedDict now that dict guarantees to keep insertion order

New submission from Eric V. Smith : There are several places where OrderedDict escapes from dataclasses. Switching to dict means we don't have to use OrderedDict forever. For the 3.6 backport, I'm also going to use dict. I saw an analysis (from Raymond, maybe?) that says