[issue34033] distutils is not reproducible

Change by Chih-Hsuan Yen : -- nosy: +yan12125 ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe:

[issue34033] distutils is not reproducible

Change by Jeffery To : -- nosy: +jefferyto ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe:

[issue34033] distutils is not reproducible

Change by Matej Cepl : -- nosy: -mcepl ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe:

[issue34033] distutils is not reproducible

Petr Viktorin added the comment: > There is also one aspect where i586 builds end up with different .pyc files > than x86_64 builds. And then we randomly chose one of them for our "noarch" > python module packages and hope they work everywhere (including on arm and > s390 architectures).

[issue34033] distutils is not reproducible

Bernhard M. Wiedemann added the comment: unreproducible .pyc files are still one of the major headaches for my work on openSUSE reproducible builds. There is also one aspect where i586 builds end up with different .pyc files than x86_64 builds. And then we randomly chose one of them for our

[issue34033] distutils is not reproducible

Change by Zbyszek Jędrzejewski-Szmek : -- nosy: +zbysz ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe:

[issue34033] distutils is not reproducible

Change by Sascha Silbe : -- nosy: +sascha_silbe ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe:

[issue34033] distutils is not reproducible

INADA Naoki added the comment: OK, I created sub issue for pyc. -- dependencies: +Reproducible pyc: FLAG_REF is not stable., remove *_INTERNED opcodes from marshal ___ Python tracker

[issue34033] distutils is not reproducible

STINNER Victor added the comment: > Is this issue for only known marshal issue? IMHO the order in which .pyc files are created on disk also matters. It changes the result of "os.listdir()": some application can rely on unsorted os.listdir(). sorted() seems simple and hardless compared to

[issue34033] distutils is not reproducible

Benjamin Peterson added the comment: We should probably discuss the marshal issue in the preëxisting #31377. I'm not sure if "distutils is not reproducible" is a larger issue than "pyc compilation is not reproducible". This issue could be a meta issue for either. --

[issue34033] distutils is not reproducible

Change by INADA Naoki : -- pull_requests: +7764 ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe:

[issue34033] distutils is not reproducible

INADA Naoki added the comment: Is this issue for only known marshal issue? Or is this issue for all issues in distutils including unknowns? -- nosy: +inada.naoki ___ Python tracker

[issue34033] distutils is not reproducible

Change by Matej Cepl : -- nosy: +mcepl ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe:

[issue34033] distutils is not reproducible

Benjamin Peterson added the comment: I agree that we should fix the underlying issue (marshal) rather than papering over it by sorting. In fact, we should have a test that compiles a bunch of pycs in a random orders and sees if they're the same or not. -- nosy: +benjamin.peterson

[issue34033] distutils is not reproducible

STINNER Victor added the comment: Copy of https://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1049186 first message: """ e.g. python-simplejson has one-bit diffs in .pyc files See http://rb.zq1.de/compare.factory-20170713/python-simplejson-compare.out in python3-simplejson.rpm we get -4e50 68

[issue34033] distutils is not reproducible

Change by STINNER Victor : -- keywords: +patch pull_requests: +7677 stage: -> patch review ___ Python tracker ___ ___

[issue34033] distutils is not reproducible

New submission from STINNER Victor : Follow up of bpo-29708: OpenSUSE uses a downstream patch for distutils to fix https://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1049186: distutils-reproducible-compile.patch. I converted the patch as a PR: PR 8057. Naoki INADA wrote: """ Currently, marshal