Georg Brandl ge...@python.org added the comment:
Is this still relevant?
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue3417
___
___
Changes by Éric Araujo mer...@netwok.org:
--
nosy: +eric.araujo
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue3417
___
___
Python-bugs-list
Changes by Benjamin Peterson benja...@python.org:
--
resolution: - wont fix
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue3417
___
___
Changes by Benjamin Peterson benja...@python.org:
--
status: open - closed
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue3417
___
___
Rodrigo Bernardo Pimentel [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
(I've just realized it's not working properly for fix_dict; I'm fixing
it and will drop a note here when it is)
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue3417
Rodrigo Bernardo Pimentel [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
I haven't managed to successfully complete the summer of code, due to
some personal problems, but I'm still working on 2to3 and on confidence
ranking for it.
There's a bzr branch with its current implementation at
Benjamin Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Ok. I'll mark this as something to do for 2.7/3.1.
--
versions: +Python 2.7, Python 3.1
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue3417
Collin Winter [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
I think the proper way to address this is via the confidence levels that
Rodrigo Bernardo Pimentel is adding for his Summer of Code project. The
idea is that you'll be able to say let me inspect any changes where the
fixer is less than X%
Benjamin Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
for k in d.keys():
return k # needs to return a list
Could you explain this a bit more?
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue3417
___
Raymond Hettinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
The example was mucked-up :( The question is that when for-looping
over d.keys/items etc, how you know that the body of the loop isn't
going to mutate the dict?
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Benjamin Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Exactly! For example, if the .items call is in a for loop, list()
doesn't need to be called.
--
title: make the fix_dict fixer explicit - make the fix_dict fixer smarter
___
Python tracker [EMAIL
Raymond Hettinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
for k in d.keys():
return k # needs to return a list
--
nosy: +rhettinger
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue3417
___
12 matches
Mail list logo