[issue34767] Optimize asyncio.Lock

Andrew Svetlov added the comment: Thanks, Zackery! -- resolution: -> fixed stage: patch review -> resolved status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker ___

[issue34767] Optimize asyncio.Lock

miss-islington added the comment: New changeset 87a865ec15fa899a1f12be81f41a4c5e649a2833 by Miss Islington (bot) in branch '3.8': bpo-34767: Do not always create a collections.deque() in asyncio.Lock() (GH-13834)

[issue34767] Optimize asyncio.Lock

Change by Zackery Spytz : -- nosy: +ZackerySpytz versions: +Python 3.9 ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list

[issue34767] Optimize asyncio.Lock

Change by miss-islington : -- pull_requests: +13715 pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/13837 ___ Python tracker ___

[issue34767] Optimize asyncio.Lock

miss-islington added the comment: New changeset 9aa78566fbeeb8cdaa669ad22f92cf63765f4135 by Miss Islington (bot) (Zackery Spytz) in branch 'master': bpo-34767: Do not always create a collections.deque() in asyncio.Lock() (GH-13834)

[issue34767] Optimize asyncio.Lock

Change by Zackery Spytz : -- keywords: +patch pull_requests: +13713 stage: -> patch review pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/13834 ___ Python tracker ___

[issue34767] Optimize asyncio.Lock

New submission from Yury Selivanov : There's no point in always creating a deque() for waiters in Lock.__init__. Not all locks end up using waiters. -- components: asyncio messages: 325997 nosy: asvetlov, yselivanov priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: Optimize