[issue35354] Generator functions stack overflow

Mark Shannon added the comment: I'm closing this as a duplicate of https://bugs.python.org/issue6028 Making a recursive call in an except block cannot be handled sensibly by the interpreter. On exceeding the stack depth, the interpreter will raise a RecursionError. Catching a

[issue35354] Generator functions stack overflow

Karthikeyan Singaravelan added the comment: Brett, the user had an invalid email address in their profile thus adding comments to the issue caused a server error while sending notification to them. So they have been removed from the issue. Please see :

[issue35354] Generator functions stack overflow

Brett Cannon added the comment: How did you make a recursive generator? The 'yield' would have paused execution. Do you have code you can share to reproduce? Otherwise blowing your stack out is normal behaviour in a function which you can deal with by lowering your stack depth with

[issue35354] Generator functions stack overflow

Karthikeyan Singaravelan added the comment: > I think I have seen this bug reported elsewhere but can't find it now. Sorry, I was referring to issue6028 and issue32570 that I thought were similar to the original report. -- ___ Python tracker

[issue35354] Generator functions stack overflow

Change by Ezio Melotti : -- nosy: -asdwqii ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe:

[issue35354] Generator functions stack overflow

Ezio Melotti added the comment: > I think I have seen this bug reported elsewhere but can't find it now. Sorry, I was referring to issue6028 and issue32570 that I thought were similar to the original report. (Karthikeyan is having trouble posting, so I'm trying on his behalf.) --

[issue35354] Generator functions stack overflow

Karthikeyan Singaravelan added the comment: > I think I have seen this bug reported elsewhere but can't find it now. Sorry, I was referring to issue6028 and issue32570 that I thought were similar to the original report. -- ___ Python tracker

[issue35354] Generator functions stack overflow

Karthikeyan Singaravelan added the comment: > I think I have seen this bug reported elsewhere but can't find it now. Sorry, I was referring to issue6028 and issue32570 that I thought were similar to the original report. -- ___ Python tracker

[issue35354] Generator functions stack overflow

Karthikeyan Singaravelan added the comment: > I think I have seen this bug reported elsewhere but can't find it now. Sorry, I was referring to issue6028 and issue32570 that I thought were similar to the original report. -- ___ Python tracker

[issue35354] Generator functions stack overflow

Karthikeyan Singaravelan added the comment: > I think I have seen this bug reported elsewhere but can't find it now. Sorry, I was referring to issue6028 and issue32570 that I thought were similar to the original report. -- ___ Python tracker

[issue35354] Generator functions stack overflow

Karthikeyan Singaravelan added the comment: > I think I have seen this bug reported elsewhere but can't find it now. Sorry, I was referring to issue6028 and issue32570 that I thought were similar to the original report. -- ___ Python tracker

[issue35354] Generator functions stack overflow

Karthikeyan Singaravelan added the comment: > I think I have seen this bug reported elsewhere but can't find it now. Sorry, I was referring to issue6028 and issue32570 that I thought were similar to the original report -- ___ Python tracker

[issue35354] Generator functions stack overflow

Karthikeyan Singaravelan added the comment: > I think I have seen this bug reported elsewhere but can't find it now. Sorry, I was referring to issue6028 and issue32570 that I thought were similar to the original report. -- ___ Python tracker

[issue35354] Generator functions stack overflow

Karthikeyan Singaravelan added the comment: > I think I have seen this bug reported elsewhere but can't find it now. Sorry, I was referring to issue6028 and issue32570 that I thought were similar to the original report. -- ___ Python tracker

[issue35354] Generator functions stack overflow

Karthikeyan Singaravelan added the comment: > I think I have seen this bug reported elsewhere but can't find it now. Sorry, I was referring to issue6028 and issue32570 that I thought were similar to the original report. -- ___ Python tracker

[issue35354] Generator functions stack overflow

Karthikeyan Singaravelan added the comment: > I think I have seen this bug reported elsewhere but can't find it now. Sorry, I was referring to issue6028 and issue32570 that I thought were similar to the original report. -- ___ Python tracker

[issue35354] Generator functions stack overflow

Karthikeyan Singaravelan added the comment: I was referring to issue6028 and issue32570. -- ___ Python tracker ___ ___

[issue35354] Generator functions stack overflow

Karthikeyan Singaravelan added the comment: I was referring to issue6028 and issue32570. -- ___ Python tracker ___ ___

[issue35354] Generator functions stack overflow

Karthikeyan Singaravelan added the comment: I was referring to issue6028 and issue32570. -- ___ Python tracker ___ ___

[issue35354] Generator functions stack overflow

Karthikeyan Singaravelan added the comment: I was referring to issue6028 and issue32570. -- ___ Python tracker ___ ___

[issue35354] Generator functions stack overflow

Karthikeyan Singaravelan added the comment: I think I have seen this bug reported elsewhere but can't find it now. A simple reproducer : def foo(): try: raise Exception() except: foo() foo() Running under gdb on Ubuntu : Program received signal SIGABRT, Aborted.

[issue35354] Generator functions stack overflow

New submission from - : Gоt `Fatal Python error: Cannot recover from stack overflow.` on Windows 10, not tested on other os. Crashed when use undefined variable. -- components: Interpreter Core files: crash.py messages: 330710 nosy: SUHAR1K priority: normal severity: normal status: