[issue3606] 2to3: commands varible replaced by subprocess

Changes by Benjamin Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: -- resolution: -> wont fix status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ___

[issue3606] 2to3: commands varible replaced by subprocess

STINNER Victor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: Ok, no problem. So you can close this (invalid) issue. ___ Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ___ _

[issue3606] 2to3: commands varible replaced by subprocess

Collin Winter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: Victor: that's a common problem in most fixers. The analysis needed to statically determine whether a given identifier is a module or not is expensive and heuristic. One of our Summer of Code students has been working on adding a new feature t

[issue3606] 2to3: commands varible replaced by subprocess

Benjamin Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: Yes, this is because some of the commands module's functions have moved to subprocess in py3k. This is probably a won't fix. -- nosy: +benjamin.peterson ___ Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

[issue3606] 2to3: commands varible replaced by subprocess

New submission from STINNER Victor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: I tried 2to3 on my python-ptrace project and with minor changes, it works fine. One of the minor changes is to replace subprocess.split(";") by commands.split(";"). The original code was: commands = command ok = True for command