[issue3615] Expect methods for testing.

Michael Foord added the comment: The API on TestCase is already too wide without adding more methods. This is easy enough to do in a TestCase subclass for those who want it. -- resolution: -> wont fix status: pending -> closed ___ Python tracker <

[issue3615] Expect methods for testing.

Mark Lawrence added the comment: Can't see this going anywhere, might as well close unless someone is really interested. -- nosy: +BreamoreBoy status: open -> pending ___ Python tracker ___

[issue3615] Expect methods for testing.

Changes by Daniel Diniz : -- nosy: +michael.foord stage: -> patch review ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsu

[issue3615] Expect methods for testing.

Antoine Pitrou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: Interesting, but it should be discussed on the mailing-list first. Also, since this is a new feature, it must be retargeted to 2.7/3.1. -- nosy: +pitrou priority: -> normal type: -> feature request versions: +Python 2.7, Python 3.1

[issue3615] Expect methods for testing.

New submission from J. Pablo Fernández <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: I'm attaching a patch that adds expect methods to TestCase. They are like fail methods, but they don't fail immediately. They are useful when you want to catch more than one error at a time. I included some tests. There are docstrings bu