[issue36472] Some old PR with CLA not signed

Brett Cannon added the comment: I'm already going through the "CLA not signed" issues and cleaning them up, so there's no need for anyone to duplicate my work. And this is not a steering council concern but a core-workflow concern. -- resolution: -> not a bug stage: -> resolved sta

[issue36472] Some old PR with CLA not signed

Stéphane Wirtel added the comment: Brett would like to reduce the number of PRs, maybe we need to ask to the council about that point. -- nosy: +matrixise ___ Python tracker _

[issue36472] Some old PR with CLA not signed

Emmanuel Arias added the comment: > I would request this to be discussed in other channels like > https://discuss.python.org/c/core-workflow or zulip core-workflow chat or > mailing list. Ok. It good for you if I send this issue to https://discuss.python.org/c/core-workflow? Then, I close

[issue36472] Some old PR with CLA not signed

Karthikeyan Singaravelan added the comment: There were cases in the past where CLA was signed but there was mismatch in the bpo details and GitHub usernames linked due to which bot didn't change it to CLA signed. I would request this to be discussed in other channels like https://discuss.pyt

[issue36472] Some old PR with CLA not signed

New submission from Emmanuel Arias : Hello everybody! Making a searching on GitHub: is:open label:"CLA not signed" We can see that there are some PR opened with CLA not signed label. The newest is 22 days ago and the oldest is from May 8, 2017. I can closed it if you consider apropiate