[issue36515] unaligned memory access in the _sha3 extension

Change by Christian Heimes : -- resolution: -> fixed stage: patch review -> resolved status: open -> closed versions: -Python 3.6, Python 3.7, Python 3.8 ___ Python tracker

[issue36515] unaligned memory access in the _sha3 extension

Christian Heimes added the comment: New changeset ce47addfb6f176fad053431b537b77a5f170765e by Miss Islington (bot) in branch '3.9': [3.9] bpo-36515: Disable unaligned memory access in _sha3 on ARM (GH-25927) (GH-25928)

[issue36515] unaligned memory access in the _sha3 extension

miss-islington added the comment: New changeset 3b2a45ff95a68acc8276b37678c98740a232f6d4 by Miss Islington (bot) in branch '3.10': bpo-36515: Disable unaligned memory access in _sha3 on ARM (GH-25927) https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/3b2a45ff95a68acc8276b37678c98740a232f6d4

[issue36515] unaligned memory access in the _sha3 extension

Change by miss-islington : -- pull_requests: +24597 pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/25930 ___ Python tracker ___

[issue36515] unaligned memory access in the _sha3 extension

Change by miss-islington : -- nosy: +miss-islington nosy_count: 3.0 -> 4.0 pull_requests: +24595 pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/25928 ___ Python tracker

[issue36515] unaligned memory access in the _sha3 extension

Change by Gregory P. Smith : -- pull_requests: +24594 stage: -> patch review pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/25927 ___ Python tracker ___

[issue36515] unaligned memory access in the _sha3 extension

Gregory P. Smith added the comment: that patch looks fine, i'll turn it into a PR. -- assignee: christian.heimes -> gregory.p.smith nosy: +gregory.p.smith ___ Python tracker

[issue36515] unaligned memory access in the _sha3 extension

Change by Gregory P. Smith : -- assignee: -> christian.heimes versions: +Python 3.10, Python 3.11, Python 3.9 ___ Python tracker ___

[issue36515] unaligned memory access in the _sha3 extension

New submission from Matthias Klose : This was seen when running an armhf binary on a 64bit kernel. The problem is that the implementation uses unaligned memory accesses, and even is well aware of that. The module allows misaligned memory accesses by default. The NO_MISALIGNED_ACCESSES macro